Sunday, September 1, 2013

A Tale of Two Worlds

sermon by Torin Eikler
Psalm 104:1-30           Genesis 1:1-5, 20-2:3


In college I studied environmental studies, and as part of that major I took an ecology class where we explored the way natural systems function.  We looked at systems as a whole as well as how each part of a system plays into the greater synergy that makes life for all parts possible.  The class was heavy on detailed examination of the scientific “facts” that help experts in their quest to reduce the confusing complexity into sets of equations that explain things in more clear-cut terms. But we also spent some time thinking about philosophies of ecology and different perspectives on resource and species management, and in one of those units I learned the terms Neo-Malthusian and Cornucopian.

Those two words - Neo-Malthusian and Cornucopian – refer to two different and opposed views on the resources available and the future of humanity.  Neo-Malthusians follow in the footsteps of Malthus who lived at the turn of the 19th century and predicted the eventual mass die-off of humanity due to a lack of food.  Looking at the world, they see a finite - or limited – number of the resources needed to sustain human life.  Given the ever increasing number of people living on the planet, they believe that humanity will reach a point where there is no longer enough to sustain the population.  At that point, millions (if not billions) of people will die from starvation, disease, or in the increasingly violent struggle to gain control of what is left.

Cornucopians take the view that humanity will always find a way to provide what is needed to support the population.  Yes, they say, when you look at the resources around us, they seems to be too little to support all the people who are coming down the pipe, but advances in science will allow us to continually produce more of what we need from whatever there is available.  Fundamentally, they believe,… there is enough matter and energy on the Earth to provide for the ever-rising population of the world,”[1] and ultimately, we, as a species, will be able to manipulate the world and even the universe around us in order to make ends meet (so to speak).

In essence, these two viewpoints describe two different worlds – or it might be more accurate to say that they describe the same world in two very different ways.  On the one hand, this world is one of scarcity.  On the other, we are surrounded by all we could ever want or need.  We just waiting for us to take advantage of it.


In the past couple of weeks, I was reminded that these opposing views are alive and well in our society by the newest novel by Dan Brown.  The book is set in a world with a population over 7 billion and growing.  Hundreds of millions of people live in poverty.  Tens of millions die of starvation each year, and over 100 million die of disease.  Energy and water are in short supply as well, and there are an increasing number of wars fought over the diminishing amount resources.  To top it all off, many of the basic sources of food, water, and energy are getting used up so fast that they cannot replenish themselves or be replenished by any technology known to humankind.

If that sounds familiar, it should.  The world of Inferno is our world as it was several months ago, and not much has changed since then.  (Our population continues to grow at a rate of one person every 13 seconds which means that we have added about 18 people since I started this sermon.  More than 14% of those children are likely to suffer starvation, and even more will die of diseases related to malnutrition and unclean water.)  It’s not a particularly pretty picture.


Now I’m not sure which view of the world Inferno is meant to portray, and I’m not going to tell you why in case you still want to read the book.  But, there is no question in my mind that feeling I got from it fit right into the Neo-Malthusian perspective.  As I read, I was carried along by the sense of fear and worry that comes from recognizing the impossibly fragile nature of the future – and not just the future of my life ... or my children’s lives … or the life of humanity … but the future of all life on this planet.  It’s the kind of feeling that makes people want to hole up in a safe house somewhere with as large a stockpile of the necessities as possible.  It’s the kind of feeling that gets people filling whole rooms with guns and ammunition to make sure that what they have is safe.  In the end, it makes it all about you.

 
Okay … take a breath or two.  We aren’t in that place yet… not really.  So relax … relax and listen to the words of Psalm 104 for a little while….

Bless the Lord, O my soul…. 
                 You make springs gush forth in the valleys;
                        they flow between the hills, giving drink to every wild animal …. 
            By the streams the birds of the air have their homes,
                  and they sing among the branches.

You cause the grass to grow for the cattle, and plants for people to use.
                  [You] bring forth food from the earth,
                        and wine to gladden the human heart,
                              oil to make the face shine,
                                   and bread to strengthen the human heart.

 These all look to you to given them their food in due season;
                    when you give to them, they gather it up;
                           when you open your hand, they are filled with good things….
             When you send forth your spirit, they are created;
                           and you renew the face of the ground.

 
That makes you feel better doesn’t it.  The images of natural beauty and of God providing everything that we need – everything that all of creation needs … those are comforting words.  Everything will be alright, they say because God is in control.  God loves us, and God is going to take care of us.

 
At first glance, Psalm 104 looks like it would represent the opposite perspective – the Cornicopian view.  But the psalmist is not so naïve as she seems.  She is not saying that everything will work out because people will find a way.  People are hardly mentioned at all, and we certainly are not at the center of things like we often think.  God is at the center.

This psalm is a hymn of praise and re-orientation.  It calls us to remember that we are not the be all and end all.  We are part of the world, but we are just part of the world.  With its imagery that evokes the Genesis story of God’s good creation, it reminds us that the earth is the Lord’s.  Everything - all creation exists in balance and harmony … when it works together according to God’s vision … and we serve as caretakers. 

 
God’s world is a world of abundance.  It’s a world filled with good things: light and darkness, land and sea, food and water, life and potential everywhere we look.  That world is our world.  It’s the same place.  That world did exist … could exist again if we were willing put ourselves back into the life cycle of creation instead of standing outside it as we have been for so long.  So why is it so hard to live into the hope and promise of the vision of creation? Why do we struggle to trust in the abundance that God has provided?  Why do we always think that we must do all the work of making things right … for ourselves and for the world?

As J. Clinton McCann, Jr. approaches our struggle with these words:
Our motivation [in this world that preaches scarcity] is to maintain our current standard of living without trashing things so terribly or depleting natural resources so severely that we cannot pass the same style of life on to our children.  In other words, our primary concern is ourselves, and our major motivation is fear…. 

For the Psalmist, relating to the world – in our terms, perhaps, an environmental consciousness – begins with praising God.  The motivation is not fear but rejoicing in the Lord.  Praise involves the acknowledgement of God’s sovereignty and the commitment to live under God’s rule.  To take the psalmist as an example, we would have to conclude that concern for the environment begins with praising God.  To be sure, this sounds hopelessly simplistic, scientifically and technologically naïve.  But such a starting point – and its underlying conviction that the world belongs to God – is the only thing that will dislodge our arrogant assumption that we can save the world, as if it were ours to save! ….

In a profound sense, Psalm 104 puts us humans in our place – with springs and hills and trees and creeping things.  If our motivation for facing our own future and the future of the earth were to glorify God, we might even have the humility to ask ourselves what it would really mean to live in partnership with a tree or with a wild goat or with the thousands of species whose disappearance causes hardly a ripple of attention, primarily because we are convinced that nature exists to serve humanity.  Quite simply, Psalm 104 asserts that this is not the case.  Rather, to serve God will mean ultimately to serve God’s creation (as it says in Genesis 2:15 which should be translated “to serve and keep it”). ….[2]

 
Back in Ecology 204 we had an old-school blue book final.  We had an hour and a half to state whether we held the Neo-Malthusian or the Cornucopian view and then defend our position.  I chose Malthus with all his scarcity and assured destruction because all the evidence of science tells us that we live in a world defined by scarcity.  We struggle to make ends meet.  At home, out in the world, and here … we hear the message that we need more than we have, and that makes us worried and scared about what the future will look like.

I defended that perspective, but not because it’s what I believe.  I chose it because it is easier to “prove,” and in the world of scarcity where one grade can make such a big difference – where an “A” can make the difference toward a successful career, I didn’t have the courage to embrace something more risky.  So, I went with fear and Malthus even though I really believe in the world described by the psalmist. 

What would it look like if we followed the example of the psalmist … if we had the courage to embrace and be embraced by the abundance of creation? 

How would it feel if we could let go of our fear and live in joy and awe at the work of the creator? 

How would our approach to living change if we put aside the pride and worry that puts us at the center of life and began to care … really care for the rest of creation, trusting that creation … God’s creation would take care of us in return? 

What would happen if we left behind the world of scarcity that we have created and took up our place in that world … if we chose God’s world … if we embraced the abundant Kingdom of God?


[1] taken from Wikipedia on August 30, 2013.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornucopian
[2]McCann, Jr., J. Clinton. “The Book of Psalms: Introduction, Commentary, and Reflections” in The New Interpreter’s Bible: A Commentary in Twelve Volumes, Volume IV (Abingdon Press, Nashville) 1996.  1100.

No comments: