four small sermons by Carrie Eikler
Matthew 1:18-25, Isaiah 7:10-16
Fourth Sunday in Advent
One
Last week Torin told you about a new billboard that went up just around Thanksgiving outside the Lincoln Tunnel in New York. Above an outline of the 3 magi on their way to the stable, reads the words “You know it’s a myth. This season celebrate reason.” It was put up by the organization called American Atheists. You may be relieved, or humored to know, that a few days after that billboard was put up the Catholic League put up its own sign saying: “You know it’s real. This season celebrate Jesus.”
I have followed some of the dialogue going on about these billboard wars and it is interesting to see how people feel: at least those who blog, tweet, and comment on articles about the signs. Of course, some were furious with the atheists’ billboards and were relieved to see the pro-Christmas sign. Supporters of the pro-reason board laugh at the pro-Christmas billboard but under much of the poking fun, one can sense a seething frustration at misguided and righteous Christians. But a surprising number of people had messages like “I’m a Christian, but the reason sign doesn’t bother me” or “I’m an atheist, but am not offended by the Christian holiday. I say live and let live.” Or “It seems to me this tit for tat is completely against what Christmas is supposed to be about: about love, hope, and generosity.”
While there are a good number of loud voices rallying around each of their signs, it seems, like is often the case, many of the people are stuck somewhere in the tunnel, just wanting to get home to families, or get to work on time, or find some quiet from the all the noise the world throws at them: job layoffs, divorce, unplanned pregnancies...
choir sings "The angel Gabriel"
Two
Signs – "that by which anything is made known or represented; that which furnishes evidence; a mark; a token; an indication; a proof."
Our scriptures are laden with sign imagery. King Ahaz is the king of Judah. Threatened with invasion, the prophet Isaiah tells him to for a sign from God. And he refuses. Why would he refuse? Was he so faithful that he wouldn’t ask that of God? He had a lot to lose, so maybe he is taking the easy way out: “What I don’t know can’t hurt me.”
But Isaiah gives him a sign anyway, at least, a prophecy. And a strange one at that. In Hebrew the translation reads: “Look, the young marriageable woman pregnant, and will bear a son” Before that happens, his kingdom would be spared from invasion. What was this about? Was it to be a messianic prophecy, like Matthew later points back to? Was it simply to be a political prediction? It is not clear, but we can imagine. We can imagine…
Joseph didn’t request a sign. But he got an indication of what was to come. He had a lot to lose. Reputation, respect, honor. He could have her stoned to death, but he chooses to dismiss her. “Quietly” it says. Discreetly. Hush-hush. Maybe the neighbors won’t see. And then it comes. A sign, in the form of an angel. “It can be different than what you expect, Joseph” the angel whispers. “How?” he muses. We might ask the same. How can a baby coming be different than what we expect? We can imagine…
Three
Signs – "that by which anything is made known or represented; that which furnishes evidence; a mark; a token; an indication; a proof."
Christopher Hitchens is one of the most popular atheist thinkers of our time. In his 2007 book called God is Not Great: How religion poisons everything, he wrote “Religion has run out of justifications. Thanks to the telescope and the microscope, it no longer offers an explanation of anything important.”
Religion no longer offers an explanation of anything important. What do you think about this statement?
Hitchens argues that the only signs we need to look for are those found in the material world. They only things worth explaining are things that can be explained through reason.
I appreciated what some of the contributors to the Mennonite Church Leader magazine had to say about this dualistic debate. Here are some of their thoughts. “Unfortunately, this brand of debate between since and religion, fact and revelation, faith and reason portrays the [conversation] as an either/or [debate]. [It oversimplifies] complex issues and [leaves] us with answers that do not satisfy. Yet the truth is that science and faith have something significant in common: [that is] their shared passion for mystery. Both religion and science seek to open up Mystery, understand it, know it, and in some form integrate it into the meaning of our lives. And both science and religion must at some point make a leap of the imagination to connect Mystery either to reason or to faith.”
Imagination – "Ability to form mental images, sensations, and concepts in a moment when they are not perceived through sight, hearing, or other senses. The work of the mind that helps create."
“Imagination in the hands of science opens up new avenues of knowledge. [says the authors in "The Leader"] "Imagination in the hands of religion opens up new avenues of hope. ‘Immanuel, God with us’ is more than a neatly packaged theological insight; it is an imaginative leap on the part of humanity and God both.”
The power of imagination, whether through science or religion, is that it opens up new and beautiful vistas of what it means to be human. And discovering new ways to be human, it seems to me, is at the heart of the mystery of Advent.
Four
Last Saturday, Lois Harder, a member of our congregation, took Torin and me to a concert of the Renaissance City Choir in Pittsburgh. And while the voices were enough to draw my eyes closed and send me into the heavens, I found myself wide awake, staring at one person on stage. Not one of the singers, but an important member of the choir, nonetheless: the sign language interpreter.
And at first I thought, how funny, that people who couldn’t hear, or at least who had difficulty hearing, would want to come to a choral concert. I quickly admonished my thought, recognizing that there are those who use sign language who can still hear the music, but can’t hear the words clearly. But maybe even those who were totally deaf could relate to what was going on through the signs.
But why? I thought? If they couldn’t hear the music, why come? If they couldn’t experience it like the rest of us, to experience the audible sound of a 1oo-person choir, how could they experience the beauty?
And I kept watching her—the sign interpreter. I watched how her body moved with the rhythm of the song. How her facial expressions mimicked the tone of the story within the songs.
I watched how there was a wide space of imagination created to connect the signs of her hands to the spirit of the choir’s singing. But I also recognized how that wide space of imagination allowed for an entirely new experience—while I accessed the beauty through my hearing, the signs, and the body, and the expression…the imagination allowed for another way of relating to beauty for the deaf and hard of hearing.
In this wide space of imagination, I realized that two people can come to the same beauty in different ways. And strangely, it was through the signs that I couldn’t understand…that I understood.
Advent is the time to cultivate the imagination. Not to put aside reason in order to blindly believe in a virgin birth or stories of angels. But to imagine about the possibilities. To open up to the mystery and encounter beautiful vistas of what it means to be human. Imagination is sacred because it opens us up to see the sign of God’s advent in our midst.
Where is your imagination being stretched this Advent to see the sign?
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Hope, Doubt and Expectation
sermon by Torin Eikler
Isaiah 35:1-10 Matthew 11:2-11
Patience and I have had a long and strange relationship. When I was a child, I thought like a child. When I wanted something I wanted it, and I wanted it right now. But I was the oldest, and it didn’t take long for me to begin to learn how to wait. That began my long struggle to learn about patience – a journey punctuated by failures and moments of recommitment, and up till just a few years ago, people would have commented regularly on how understanding and tolerant I was … in my work … in my relationships … with my children. That was a matter of pride for me since I had been cultivating a laid-back approach most of my life.
These days, though, I find that I am easily goaded into irrational and even vindictive responses. Sometimes the littlest things (a small foot touching my leg under the table, for instance) spark a dark look or a snappish, “stop it now!” Sometimes my anger nearly gets free, and my voice takes on a life of its own, thundering things that I never expected to come out of my mouth at people who really don’t deserve the stormy response they are getting. If patience is a cardinal virtue than I have most certainly fallen from grace as I suspect we all have from time to time.
Patience doesn’t seem to have been an issue for John the Baptist, though – mostly because he doesn’t seem to have had much to begin with. From the beginning he shouted out his angry frustrations in tirades laced with threats and epithets, preaching fire and brimstone and the judgment to come. Strangely, his angry rants seem to have drawn crowds of people. Some came just for the show. Others took his message to heart and left with new resolution to change their lives. Eventually his critiques got the attention of the rich and powerful landing him in prison, and this man of the wilderness found himself in a dark cell, locked away from the freedom he had known.
I think it must have been hard for him to sit there day after day. No sunlight to order the rhythm of his life. None of the honey he was used to eating (though I suspect he might have appreciated exchanging bread for the locust that had been his mainstay). No one to talk to but the guards and an occasional visitor. If he didn’t know patience before, he must have learned a measure of it there as he waited for the Messiah to fulfill the promises of Isaiah and set the prisoners free.
But time wore on, and the prophesies that John had made did not come to pass. He began to wonder, and his patience wore thin. And that was reason enough for John the Baptist, the cousin of Jesus who had jumped for joy when he recognized the messiah while the two were still in the womb, to begin to doubt.
Doubt may seem like a strange theme to bring into Advent with its promises of joy and love and peace for all humanity, but I think it has a place here. There are surveys that suggest that anywhere from 15-30% of people in attendance at any given church service (clergy and laity alike) would say that they don’t really believe in everything the church teaches about Christ: angelic visitors, virgin births, kings following a star to visit a baby god on the strength of a dream. There is a billboard that just went up at the entrance to the Lincoln Tunnel in New York that pretty well sums it up for many people. It has the well-known Christmas card scene of men on camels headed toward a stable with a star overhead, and it reads, “You KNOW it’s a MYTH. This season celebrate REASON!”
You may or may not be part of the 15-30%, but I think it’s probably safe to say that most of us have our doubts about the story of the nativity, about many of the stories in the Bible, and even (or maybe especially) the some of the teachings of the church. I don’t think that’s a bad thing. Doubt is a part of faith. There are some who even say that those of us who experience doubts are closer to the Kingdom than those who are absolutely certain about their beliefs. Doubts drive us back to God, asking again and again: “Is this for real? Are you really that kind of God? Is your love so great that you would actually become human and die for us?” “Are you the one who is to come, or are we to wait for another?” And the same doubts leave us questioning ourselves too. What do we believe? Does it matter what we believe? Should it really change how we live? If it is all true – if Christ really did become human to bring us salvation, what does God expect of us in return?
Expectation … now there’s an idea we are more comfortable with. We’re all about expectation in Advent. We expect snow and cold. We expect crowds of people shopping for the gifts that are expected under the tree on Christmas morning. We expect warmth and holiday cheer in those we meet (though we don’t always find that at the mall). We expect to hear the story of how God came to live among us as a helpless baby in a lowly stable.
But things don’t always meet our expectations. They fall short, or they go beyond. Sometimes events just go in an entirely different direction than we imagined. That shakes us up, gets us out of sorts. I think that’s part of my struggle with patience. My children – other events and other people too, but mostly my children don’t live up to my expectations. They don’t always eat the food we have lovingly prepared. Sometimes they throw it on the floor. They don’t always play nicely together. They hit each other, and they won’t share toys. They don’t always listen to me (that’s a big one). They are generally lovely and well-behaved boys for everyone else, but they just aren’t for me, and somehow that seems to be reason enough for me to get … shall we say “frustrated.”
“Frustrated” might be a good word for John’s response when Jesus didn’t fulfill his hopes. There he was in prison for taking on Herod – for starting the revolution that he expected Jesus to lead and Jesus was healing people, raising them from the dead, and … teaching them. This was not the Messiah that John envisioned. Where was the righteous cleansing? Where were the winnowing fork and the burning chaff? Where was the ax laying waste to the forest of corruption that had so fueled his anger? If this was the one anointed to bring redemption to the Jews, then that redemption was totally different than he had expected.
But God … God is not bound by our expectations, and as maddening as that may be, it’s a good thing. If things always went according to human expectations, who knows what kind of mess we would have made of the world by now. None of us would have envisioned the god-baby Jesus. None of us could have predicted the depth of divine love and mercy. None of us would have framed redemption in terms of the reconciling grace brought by Christ.
In an email discussion this week, one of my colleagues described Mary’s Magnificat as a song of revolt – a song that rejoiced in the promise of change – of human vision broken open by the power of divine love. The Messiah she proclaims would not be what … would not be who people expected. He would come scattering the proud-hearted, bringing down the powerful, lifting up the lowly, filling the hungry, and sending the rich away hungry. He would not lead a grand rebellion overthrowing the Roman authorities and gathering the people once more into a great nation. His revolution would change the world in a different way: bringing sight to the blind, healing the lame, cleansing the leprous, raising the dead. Restoring the outcast to society and reconciling humanity to God, he would change the world one person at a time.
It’s a revolution that is still going on. One person at a time, the Child of Hope bring healing and reconciliation. One person at a time, the Prince of Peace brings love and peace into the world. One person at a time – one you and one me – Christ comes into the world, and the promise of the babe in the manger is born.
In little ways – little unexpected ways, the Kingdom of God is coming near. That is reason enough for hope. That is reason enough for faith in the face of doubt. That is reason enough for joy in the midst of our waiting.
Isaiah 35:1-10 Matthew 11:2-11
Patience and I have had a long and strange relationship. When I was a child, I thought like a child. When I wanted something I wanted it, and I wanted it right now. But I was the oldest, and it didn’t take long for me to begin to learn how to wait. That began my long struggle to learn about patience – a journey punctuated by failures and moments of recommitment, and up till just a few years ago, people would have commented regularly on how understanding and tolerant I was … in my work … in my relationships … with my children. That was a matter of pride for me since I had been cultivating a laid-back approach most of my life.
These days, though, I find that I am easily goaded into irrational and even vindictive responses. Sometimes the littlest things (a small foot touching my leg under the table, for instance) spark a dark look or a snappish, “stop it now!” Sometimes my anger nearly gets free, and my voice takes on a life of its own, thundering things that I never expected to come out of my mouth at people who really don’t deserve the stormy response they are getting. If patience is a cardinal virtue than I have most certainly fallen from grace as I suspect we all have from time to time.
Patience doesn’t seem to have been an issue for John the Baptist, though – mostly because he doesn’t seem to have had much to begin with. From the beginning he shouted out his angry frustrations in tirades laced with threats and epithets, preaching fire and brimstone and the judgment to come. Strangely, his angry rants seem to have drawn crowds of people. Some came just for the show. Others took his message to heart and left with new resolution to change their lives. Eventually his critiques got the attention of the rich and powerful landing him in prison, and this man of the wilderness found himself in a dark cell, locked away from the freedom he had known.
I think it must have been hard for him to sit there day after day. No sunlight to order the rhythm of his life. None of the honey he was used to eating (though I suspect he might have appreciated exchanging bread for the locust that had been his mainstay). No one to talk to but the guards and an occasional visitor. If he didn’t know patience before, he must have learned a measure of it there as he waited for the Messiah to fulfill the promises of Isaiah and set the prisoners free.
But time wore on, and the prophesies that John had made did not come to pass. He began to wonder, and his patience wore thin. And that was reason enough for John the Baptist, the cousin of Jesus who had jumped for joy when he recognized the messiah while the two were still in the womb, to begin to doubt.
Doubt may seem like a strange theme to bring into Advent with its promises of joy and love and peace for all humanity, but I think it has a place here. There are surveys that suggest that anywhere from 15-30% of people in attendance at any given church service (clergy and laity alike) would say that they don’t really believe in everything the church teaches about Christ: angelic visitors, virgin births, kings following a star to visit a baby god on the strength of a dream. There is a billboard that just went up at the entrance to the Lincoln Tunnel in New York that pretty well sums it up for many people. It has the well-known Christmas card scene of men on camels headed toward a stable with a star overhead, and it reads, “You KNOW it’s a MYTH. This season celebrate REASON!”
You may or may not be part of the 15-30%, but I think it’s probably safe to say that most of us have our doubts about the story of the nativity, about many of the stories in the Bible, and even (or maybe especially) the some of the teachings of the church. I don’t think that’s a bad thing. Doubt is a part of faith. There are some who even say that those of us who experience doubts are closer to the Kingdom than those who are absolutely certain about their beliefs. Doubts drive us back to God, asking again and again: “Is this for real? Are you really that kind of God? Is your love so great that you would actually become human and die for us?” “Are you the one who is to come, or are we to wait for another?” And the same doubts leave us questioning ourselves too. What do we believe? Does it matter what we believe? Should it really change how we live? If it is all true – if Christ really did become human to bring us salvation, what does God expect of us in return?
Expectation … now there’s an idea we are more comfortable with. We’re all about expectation in Advent. We expect snow and cold. We expect crowds of people shopping for the gifts that are expected under the tree on Christmas morning. We expect warmth and holiday cheer in those we meet (though we don’t always find that at the mall). We expect to hear the story of how God came to live among us as a helpless baby in a lowly stable.
But things don’t always meet our expectations. They fall short, or they go beyond. Sometimes events just go in an entirely different direction than we imagined. That shakes us up, gets us out of sorts. I think that’s part of my struggle with patience. My children – other events and other people too, but mostly my children don’t live up to my expectations. They don’t always eat the food we have lovingly prepared. Sometimes they throw it on the floor. They don’t always play nicely together. They hit each other, and they won’t share toys. They don’t always listen to me (that’s a big one). They are generally lovely and well-behaved boys for everyone else, but they just aren’t for me, and somehow that seems to be reason enough for me to get … shall we say “frustrated.”
“Frustrated” might be a good word for John’s response when Jesus didn’t fulfill his hopes. There he was in prison for taking on Herod – for starting the revolution that he expected Jesus to lead and Jesus was healing people, raising them from the dead, and … teaching them. This was not the Messiah that John envisioned. Where was the righteous cleansing? Where were the winnowing fork and the burning chaff? Where was the ax laying waste to the forest of corruption that had so fueled his anger? If this was the one anointed to bring redemption to the Jews, then that redemption was totally different than he had expected.
But God … God is not bound by our expectations, and as maddening as that may be, it’s a good thing. If things always went according to human expectations, who knows what kind of mess we would have made of the world by now. None of us would have envisioned the god-baby Jesus. None of us could have predicted the depth of divine love and mercy. None of us would have framed redemption in terms of the reconciling grace brought by Christ.
In an email discussion this week, one of my colleagues described Mary’s Magnificat as a song of revolt – a song that rejoiced in the promise of change – of human vision broken open by the power of divine love. The Messiah she proclaims would not be what … would not be who people expected. He would come scattering the proud-hearted, bringing down the powerful, lifting up the lowly, filling the hungry, and sending the rich away hungry. He would not lead a grand rebellion overthrowing the Roman authorities and gathering the people once more into a great nation. His revolution would change the world in a different way: bringing sight to the blind, healing the lame, cleansing the leprous, raising the dead. Restoring the outcast to society and reconciling humanity to God, he would change the world one person at a time.
It’s a revolution that is still going on. One person at a time, the Child of Hope bring healing and reconciliation. One person at a time, the Prince of Peace brings love and peace into the world. One person at a time – one you and one me – Christ comes into the world, and the promise of the babe in the manger is born.
In little ways – little unexpected ways, the Kingdom of God is coming near. That is reason enough for hope. That is reason enough for faith in the face of doubt. That is reason enough for joy in the midst of our waiting.
Sunday, December 5, 2010
The Gift of Repentance
Sermon by Carrie Eikler
Isaiah, 10:33-11:9, Matthew 3:1-12
Second Sunday in Advent
I think that each generation has a crisis that defines them Actually most generations have a multitude of crises. For people my age, 9-11 was decisive, but we were adults in our early 20s. We analyzed, criticized, pointed fingers with the rest of the adult world we were growing into.
I’d venture to say that for people my age, a critical moment of our childhood was in January 1986 when millions of school children gathered around televisions sets to watch the first public school teacher fly into outer space.
As you know, Christa McAuliff and the rest of the crew of the Challenger never made it. The Challenger exploded in the first few minutes of take off, leaving this eight-year old, and other eight-year olds at the time, forming a critique of technology’s limits because of what we witnessed, because of the fear it caused us.
For my mother, it was the death of John Kennedy. She remembers crying in her cafeteria when she heard the news. And yet for others, in the year before that event, what was going on south of Florida, in Cuba, that shaped the tenor of their fear. In 1962 the Cuban missile crisis brought the threat of nuclear war, literally, to our back door. A new crisis was born in the lives of Americans.
Some of you remember this time. Some of you were children. Some of you feared for your children. The future, undoubtedly, seemed a fragile hope.
It was this fear that prompted the songwriters Noel Regney and Gloria Shayne Baker to write a peace hymn, which became a beloved Christmas song. You probably know it “Said the night wind to the little lamb ‘Do you see what I see?”. This song has been recorded by over 100 different artists.
If you know it well, you likely have the cool crooning of Bing Crosby in your mind, singing one of the most familiar recordings of the song—a version that, ironically, was recorded on the day Kennedy was assassinated.
But as many times as it’s been reinterpreted and recorded, it has at its core an unwavering message: “I am amazed that people think they know the song” said the song’s author Noel Regney, “and not know it was a prayer for peace.”
But more than the images it evokes of shepherd boys and night winds and mighty kings, we are left with a question: do you? Do you see what I see? Do you hear what I hear? Do you know what I know?
Do you?
Do you see the possibility of predators protecting their prey? Of coal companies healing the mountains? Of people actually restraining their consumptive habits? Do you see the possibility of Christians transforming their good intentions into radical acts of faith?
Do you see what God sees?
Do you see the possibility of living without shame? Of bedding down your envy with your potential? Do you see the possibility of living in peace, with yourself?
It’s a sweet, perhaps too sweet, vision, isn’t it?
So it is with questions like this that we cross the threshold into the season of Advent. And like honey dripping off a prophet’s lip we encounter, not a polite invitation, but an urgent demand.
Prepare. Get ready to see what God sees because you’re going to see God. It’s all going to be clear.
Those things you’ve hidden from yourself, you’re gonna see them.
Those things you’ve denied about yourself or the world around you, you’re gonna have to deal with them.
The potential you’ve neglected, the purpose you’ve pushed aside, the blind eye you’ve given to the world’s misery—all of it is going to be crystal clear to you…and where will you be then?
What will you construct to protect yourself when you’re seeing what God’s seeing?
Do you really think you’ll be spared this new sight?
Who warned you to flee the wrath to come?
[pause]
Now I don’t know if this was the most effective way for John the Baptist to proclaim the coming of Jesus. Generally, fear tactics have initial success but don’t really give long term payoffs. But who am I to judge his PR skills? We have to assume that his audience was receptive, at least in part, because their spirits longed for such an invitation, albeit a scary one.
Though, honestly, I can appreciate the invitation to prepare. It assumes some measure of time involved, a process, an orderly sequence of events.
But while we often say that John’s message is about preparation, if we look closely at the text, he does not say “prepare”. The author of Matthew describes this wild-eyed prophet by quoting Isaiah saying this is the one Isaiah spoke about, a “voice of one crying out I the wilderness; ‘Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.’”
No, John himself does not say "prepare." John says "repent."
That’s a whole another thing, in our minds.
Preparation probably means you know what to expect.
Repentance means anything could happen.
Preparing is logical.
Repenting is messy.
Repentance is not something we think of when we enter into Advent. And it is here that I think we have let the consumer calendar overshadow the church’s calendar. The commercials will tell you that Christmas celebration begins around Thanksgiving, or earlier.
But the church reminds us that to get to that celebration (which begins on Christmas) we move through Advent. A time of waiting. Of preparing our hearts. It is not a time of making orderly lists of gifts, but entering the messy tangle of repentance.
Which is probably what John would say is the best way to prepare ourselves. Like the saying “honesty is the best policy”, John the Baptist tells us “repentance is the best preparation.”
But there is a problem, I think. Most of us don’t like the word repentance. As I forced myself to encounter my hangups about repentance this is what I came up with in some of my writing earlier this week: “Repentance seems like an unobtainable demand , and I am set up for failure. There will always be something I did wrong. Hearing about repentance beats me over the head with my mistakes and constantly reminds me of how unworthy I am.”
What do you think of when you hear the word “repentance”?
How would you feel if someone demand you to repent?
Kathleen Norris writes about helping young children in a parochial school encounter the Psalms by having them write some of their own. One honest little boy wrote a poem called “The Monster Who Was Sorry.” In his poem he talked about how his father would often yell at him, and his response to this, in the poem, was to “throw his sister down the stairs, and then to wreck his room, and finally to wreck the whole town. The poem concludes: ‘Then I sit in my messy house and say to myself, I shouldn’t have done that.’”
“’My messy house’ explains it all,” Norris reflects. “If that boy had been[a young monk] in the fourth-century monastic desert, his elders might have told him that he was well on the way toward repentance, not such a monster after all, but only human. If the house is messy, they might have said, why not clean it up, why not make it into a place where God might wish to dwell?” (A Vocabulary of Faith, 70).
The line of God’s relationship to humanity as seen in scripture from the Garden of Eden on is a dynamic relationship, of God knowing we are more than our messy houses: God making creation good, God being disappointed, God encouraging, God being disappointed, God praising humanity…God being disappointed.
And then as if God knew nothing else to do, God- because of love- came to us.
and bedded down in our messy house.
God probably came in anticipation. God probably had some questions: Will they see me? Will they be prepared for me? Will they repent of those things that keep them from really seeing me? Will they start to see within themselves what I have always known, always heard, always seen?
And—like that honey dripping off the lips of the prophet-- the sticky invitation (slash) demand comes, telling us how to prepare. How to make ourselves ready for the divine and the human to dwell together, without consuming each other, without overpowering, or exploiting.
Prepare for God to lay down with your troubled soul with the gift of repentance.
Repent, not so you are ashamed of what keeps you bound
but to free you so you can begin to see what God sees in you.
Repent, not so you are constantly reminded of how unworthy or wicked you are but
repent
so you can encounter God’s insurmountable love for the world.
[pause]
It would be arrogant to believe that we will see entirely with God’s eyes.
But it would be denying the miracle of the incarnation to believe that we can’t, in some small way, with some small hint of clarity, look for what God sees and hopes for in this world.
And you—can you begin to see what God sees in you?
If not, receive God’s gift.
Prepare.
Repent.
And see.
Isaiah, 10:33-11:9, Matthew 3:1-12
Second Sunday in Advent
I think that each generation has a crisis that defines them Actually most generations have a multitude of crises. For people my age, 9-11 was decisive, but we were adults in our early 20s. We analyzed, criticized, pointed fingers with the rest of the adult world we were growing into.
I’d venture to say that for people my age, a critical moment of our childhood was in January 1986 when millions of school children gathered around televisions sets to watch the first public school teacher fly into outer space.
As you know, Christa McAuliff and the rest of the crew of the Challenger never made it. The Challenger exploded in the first few minutes of take off, leaving this eight-year old, and other eight-year olds at the time, forming a critique of technology’s limits because of what we witnessed, because of the fear it caused us.
For my mother, it was the death of John Kennedy. She remembers crying in her cafeteria when she heard the news. And yet for others, in the year before that event, what was going on south of Florida, in Cuba, that shaped the tenor of their fear. In 1962 the Cuban missile crisis brought the threat of nuclear war, literally, to our back door. A new crisis was born in the lives of Americans.
Some of you remember this time. Some of you were children. Some of you feared for your children. The future, undoubtedly, seemed a fragile hope.
It was this fear that prompted the songwriters Noel Regney and Gloria Shayne Baker to write a peace hymn, which became a beloved Christmas song. You probably know it “Said the night wind to the little lamb ‘Do you see what I see?”. This song has been recorded by over 100 different artists.
If you know it well, you likely have the cool crooning of Bing Crosby in your mind, singing one of the most familiar recordings of the song—a version that, ironically, was recorded on the day Kennedy was assassinated.
But as many times as it’s been reinterpreted and recorded, it has at its core an unwavering message: “I am amazed that people think they know the song” said the song’s author Noel Regney, “and not know it was a prayer for peace.”
But more than the images it evokes of shepherd boys and night winds and mighty kings, we are left with a question: do you? Do you see what I see? Do you hear what I hear? Do you know what I know?
Do you?
Do you see the possibility of predators protecting their prey? Of coal companies healing the mountains? Of people actually restraining their consumptive habits? Do you see the possibility of Christians transforming their good intentions into radical acts of faith?
Do you see what God sees?
Do you see the possibility of living without shame? Of bedding down your envy with your potential? Do you see the possibility of living in peace, with yourself?
It’s a sweet, perhaps too sweet, vision, isn’t it?
So it is with questions like this that we cross the threshold into the season of Advent. And like honey dripping off a prophet’s lip we encounter, not a polite invitation, but an urgent demand.
Prepare. Get ready to see what God sees because you’re going to see God. It’s all going to be clear.
Those things you’ve hidden from yourself, you’re gonna see them.
Those things you’ve denied about yourself or the world around you, you’re gonna have to deal with them.
The potential you’ve neglected, the purpose you’ve pushed aside, the blind eye you’ve given to the world’s misery—all of it is going to be crystal clear to you…and where will you be then?
What will you construct to protect yourself when you’re seeing what God’s seeing?
Do you really think you’ll be spared this new sight?
Who warned you to flee the wrath to come?
[pause]
Now I don’t know if this was the most effective way for John the Baptist to proclaim the coming of Jesus. Generally, fear tactics have initial success but don’t really give long term payoffs. But who am I to judge his PR skills? We have to assume that his audience was receptive, at least in part, because their spirits longed for such an invitation, albeit a scary one.
Though, honestly, I can appreciate the invitation to prepare. It assumes some measure of time involved, a process, an orderly sequence of events.
But while we often say that John’s message is about preparation, if we look closely at the text, he does not say “prepare”. The author of Matthew describes this wild-eyed prophet by quoting Isaiah saying this is the one Isaiah spoke about, a “voice of one crying out I the wilderness; ‘Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.’”
No, John himself does not say "prepare." John says "repent."
That’s a whole another thing, in our minds.
Preparation probably means you know what to expect.
Repentance means anything could happen.
Preparing is logical.
Repenting is messy.
Repentance is not something we think of when we enter into Advent. And it is here that I think we have let the consumer calendar overshadow the church’s calendar. The commercials will tell you that Christmas celebration begins around Thanksgiving, or earlier.
But the church reminds us that to get to that celebration (which begins on Christmas) we move through Advent. A time of waiting. Of preparing our hearts. It is not a time of making orderly lists of gifts, but entering the messy tangle of repentance.
Which is probably what John would say is the best way to prepare ourselves. Like the saying “honesty is the best policy”, John the Baptist tells us “repentance is the best preparation.”
But there is a problem, I think. Most of us don’t like the word repentance. As I forced myself to encounter my hangups about repentance this is what I came up with in some of my writing earlier this week: “Repentance seems like an unobtainable demand , and I am set up for failure. There will always be something I did wrong. Hearing about repentance beats me over the head with my mistakes and constantly reminds me of how unworthy I am.”
What do you think of when you hear the word “repentance”?
How would you feel if someone demand you to repent?
Kathleen Norris writes about helping young children in a parochial school encounter the Psalms by having them write some of their own. One honest little boy wrote a poem called “The Monster Who Was Sorry.” In his poem he talked about how his father would often yell at him, and his response to this, in the poem, was to “throw his sister down the stairs, and then to wreck his room, and finally to wreck the whole town. The poem concludes: ‘Then I sit in my messy house and say to myself, I shouldn’t have done that.’”
“’My messy house’ explains it all,” Norris reflects. “If that boy had been[a young monk] in the fourth-century monastic desert, his elders might have told him that he was well on the way toward repentance, not such a monster after all, but only human. If the house is messy, they might have said, why not clean it up, why not make it into a place where God might wish to dwell?” (A Vocabulary of Faith, 70).
The line of God’s relationship to humanity as seen in scripture from the Garden of Eden on is a dynamic relationship, of God knowing we are more than our messy houses: God making creation good, God being disappointed, God encouraging, God being disappointed, God praising humanity…God being disappointed.
And then as if God knew nothing else to do, God- because of love- came to us.
and bedded down in our messy house.
God probably came in anticipation. God probably had some questions: Will they see me? Will they be prepared for me? Will they repent of those things that keep them from really seeing me? Will they start to see within themselves what I have always known, always heard, always seen?
And—like that honey dripping off the lips of the prophet-- the sticky invitation (slash) demand comes, telling us how to prepare. How to make ourselves ready for the divine and the human to dwell together, without consuming each other, without overpowering, or exploiting.
Prepare for God to lay down with your troubled soul with the gift of repentance.
Repent, not so you are ashamed of what keeps you bound
but to free you so you can begin to see what God sees in you.
Repent, not so you are constantly reminded of how unworthy or wicked you are but
repent
so you can encounter God’s insurmountable love for the world.
[pause]
It would be arrogant to believe that we will see entirely with God’s eyes.
But it would be denying the miracle of the incarnation to believe that we can’t, in some small way, with some small hint of clarity, look for what God sees and hopes for in this world.
And you—can you begin to see what God sees in you?
If not, receive God’s gift.
Prepare.
Repent.
And see.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Wait-ing for God-with-us
sermon by Torin Eikler
Isaiah 2:1-4 Matthew 24:36-44
I want to introduce you to a quirky little group of people I first met back in the last 90s. The five of them: a dentist, two travel agents, a Dairy Queen employee, and a small time theater producer live in a small Missouri town called Blaine that claims the first alien visitation and was once famous for the stools produced there. By the time I met them, the town they lived in had become a small, depressed community clinging to its heritage just like so many communities in the Midwest, but they had a dream of putting it back on the national stage by putting on a Tony-award-worthy musical celebrating the town’s history
Over the course of several weeks, they overcome a lack of funding as well as several other obstacles (including their own lack of any real talent) and put the show together for the sesquicentennial celebrations. The real coup, though, is that using his New York connections, Corky arranged for a representative of the prestigious Oppenheimer Organization named Mort Guffman to come and watch the production. If Mr. Guffman liked the show, Corky said, they would have a good chance of taking it to Broadway.
You should know (if you haven’t figured it out yet) that this is not the real world … not exactly. This is the world of a satirical movie called “Waiting for Guffman” that has become something of a cult classic on a small scale. As the title suggests, the climax of the movie comes on opening night when the cast and crew are waiting anxiously for Mr. Guffman to show up so that they can start the show, having pinned all their hopes for a golden future on what is sure to be his good review. But Guffman is late, and so they wait and wait … and wait. And the audience waits and waits … and waits.
(pause)
That’s one kind of waiting – nervous waiting, waiting with anticipation, waiting for something that will change your life … maybe save it? Or, if you’re in the audience, it’s waiting with frustration for a distraction that you’ve been looking forward to.
(pause)
Let me tell you how the story ends. I’d hate to keep you waiting, after all.
Of course, the show has to start eventually. So, they begin, all the time keeping an eye out to see if the empty chair in the front row has been filled. Finally, just before the intermission an elderly gentleman is directed to the chair, and the cast throws everything they have into the second act. When it’s all over and they have taken their final bows, they wait eagerly in the dressing room only to discover that the man in question is not the right guy. Mr. Guffman, as it turns out, was not able to attend the show. And life goes on in Blaine – plain ordinary life, life with a little less luster for the hope unfulfilled.
Now let me introduce you to another group of wait-ers. This one is much, much bigger, and it has been growing for a long, long time. In the beginning, it was a movement of just a few thousand people spread across a lot of space, and they were waiting for a prophecy to be fulfilled. That prophesy said that Christ would return before the first generation of his followers passed away, and they interpreted it literally. So, they, too, were waiting and waiting … and waiting. Waiting together. Waiting through suffering and persecution. Waiting in poverty. Waiting with anticipation. Waiting with hope. Waiting for the promised Kingdom of peace and love foretold by the prophets and by Christ himself.
(pause)
Well, it didn’t happen. The first generation came and went, and no parousia – no second coming. And life went on in the Roman Empire, BUT … But the hope and the promise did not die. It was passed on from generation to generation, and down through the ages, believers have been waiting. At times, when prophetic reminders swayed them enough, people have sold all they own in preparation or gathered on hill tops to await the coming of the Lamb. Once, they even overthrew the government of Muster, Germany, convinced that it would become the New Jerusalem – the capital of the Kingdom that was coming.
Most of the time that hasn’t happened. Most of the time Christians have lived “normal” lives. Most of the time they have lived, in large part, like we do. They … and we find a way to muddle through: marrying and having families (if that comes our way), earning money to make ends meet, eating, drinking, sleeping, etc., etc., etc.
Each year at the beginning of Advent, we hear the story of Jesus’ birth again. Each year, we are reminded of the way God broke into the world at an unexpected time in and unexpected way. Each year we hear the promise echoing down the centuries, and we pick up the anticipation that we have left behind as the months wore on. And we get excited. And we sing hosannas. And we wonder at the strange compassion of a God who would become human and dwell with us.
And then life goes on. The trappings of Christmas are put away along with the Holiday spirit of warm generosity, and we take up the task of making it through another year – paying bills (sometimes too big), losing the weight we may have gained, shoveling the snow, and all the rest. And, the anticipation wanes. The hope stays with us, but the sense of expectation fades away.
(pause)
It’s hard to hold onto a sense of expectation. As days and weeks pass we get a sort of “anticipation fatigue.” Our emotional, spiritual, and physical selves get tired of being held at the ready. We come to expect that nothing will change, and we fall back into old patterns - senses dulled, sense of wonder submerged, both overwhelmed by our sense that God’s timing is inexplicable. It is hard to stay alert, especially when you don’t know what is coming or when it will arrive.
That makes it particularly hard to follow the implied command that Jesus gives to his disciples in the guise of a metaphor. “If the owner of the house had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and would not have let his house be broken into. Therefore, you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an unexpected hour.”
How does one do that? How do you prepare for an unknown thief who will come at an unknown time? Do you put in an alarm system, giving it your confidence and giving the thief time to figure out how to circumvent it? Do you hire security guards to watch around the clock, knowing that they will eventually succumb to the same fatigue I mentioned earlier? Would any of that really work against someone determined to get in?
When I was in elementary school, I participated in the Olympics of the Mind (it’s Odyssey of the Mind now … the International Olympic Committee objected to the name). It’s a program that challenges students to solve problems in creative ways, and one of the things they focus on is teaching you to think outside the box. It’s a useful skill, and it’s kind of fun. For example, one task we were given was to name as many keys as we could. The straightforward answers, of course, are things like car keys and house keys, but there are also monkeys and the Florida Keys. I think you can see how kids might enjoy this kind of challenge.
Apply this way of thinking to the question of being ready for a thief. What do you come up with?
(pause)
(I’ll give you a break. You haven’t had much time to think after all.) Here are a couple of ideas that I came up with.
You could leave your home completely unlocked and keep nothing there that someone would want to take. Or you could put up a sign inviting everyone who comes to your home to come in and join you for tea (I’m so sure that one would always work). Or you could work at changing the world around you so that nobody would need to take things from other people.
All three of those ideas require us to think and live in a different way, but isn’t that really what Jesus was challenging us with in his teaching and his living? Remember all those “you have heard it said …, but I say to you …” statements in the Sermon on the Mount. Loving enemies, turning the other cheek, and welcoming the stranger are all still huge reversals in our thinking today. The idea that in the Kingdom of Heaven the poorest, most despised members of society might have the highest status, if you really think about it, still defies our expectations – at least if the way we live is any indication. Yet these things define how we understand our dreams of the ultimate future and our lives as disciples in the present. These are the visions that we get so excited about when Advent comes along. They are the reality at the heart of the promise we hope for and wait for with or without an urgent sense of anticipation.
Often when modern pastors or theologians talk about Christian living we try to verb nouns. We characterize faith as not just a thing we have but a way that we live. We disciple people on their faith journeys. We belong people into the congregation even before they share our beliefs. But in this case, we might do well to noun a verb. Let us take the verb “wait” out of our everyday lives where it becomes a placid, tedious pause empty of action and make it something more exciting. We won’t even have to make up a new meaning. We just need to return to an old one.
“Wait,” as a noun, once meant a night watchman and developed over time into a name for a band of musicians who go around the streets during the Christmas season playing carols. What if we became a wait of sorts, wandering the streets around us while singing out the good news that God came to live with us and will come to be with us once more?
What if we went a bit farther … made our wait a little more hands on? We could share our wealth with those in need. We could care for those who are sick and alone. We could reach out with compassion to those that society despises. We could shine the light of hope and promise into the darkness of despair that sometimes seems to be overwhelming the world.
In that way, we would be living into being in a small way the promise of what is to come. We would be anticipating the Kingdom of God by living as if it were already here – as if peace, love, justice and mercy already ruled the world. And when God’s time is fulfilled, we will be ready and wait-ing to welcome the Son of Man among us.
Isaiah 2:1-4 Matthew 24:36-44
I want to introduce you to a quirky little group of people I first met back in the last 90s. The five of them: a dentist, two travel agents, a Dairy Queen employee, and a small time theater producer live in a small Missouri town called Blaine that claims the first alien visitation and was once famous for the stools produced there. By the time I met them, the town they lived in had become a small, depressed community clinging to its heritage just like so many communities in the Midwest, but they had a dream of putting it back on the national stage by putting on a Tony-award-worthy musical celebrating the town’s history
Over the course of several weeks, they overcome a lack of funding as well as several other obstacles (including their own lack of any real talent) and put the show together for the sesquicentennial celebrations. The real coup, though, is that using his New York connections, Corky arranged for a representative of the prestigious Oppenheimer Organization named Mort Guffman to come and watch the production. If Mr. Guffman liked the show, Corky said, they would have a good chance of taking it to Broadway.
You should know (if you haven’t figured it out yet) that this is not the real world … not exactly. This is the world of a satirical movie called “Waiting for Guffman” that has become something of a cult classic on a small scale. As the title suggests, the climax of the movie comes on opening night when the cast and crew are waiting anxiously for Mr. Guffman to show up so that they can start the show, having pinned all their hopes for a golden future on what is sure to be his good review. But Guffman is late, and so they wait and wait … and wait. And the audience waits and waits … and waits.
(pause)
That’s one kind of waiting – nervous waiting, waiting with anticipation, waiting for something that will change your life … maybe save it? Or, if you’re in the audience, it’s waiting with frustration for a distraction that you’ve been looking forward to.
(pause)
Let me tell you how the story ends. I’d hate to keep you waiting, after all.
Of course, the show has to start eventually. So, they begin, all the time keeping an eye out to see if the empty chair in the front row has been filled. Finally, just before the intermission an elderly gentleman is directed to the chair, and the cast throws everything they have into the second act. When it’s all over and they have taken their final bows, they wait eagerly in the dressing room only to discover that the man in question is not the right guy. Mr. Guffman, as it turns out, was not able to attend the show. And life goes on in Blaine – plain ordinary life, life with a little less luster for the hope unfulfilled.
Now let me introduce you to another group of wait-ers. This one is much, much bigger, and it has been growing for a long, long time. In the beginning, it was a movement of just a few thousand people spread across a lot of space, and they were waiting for a prophecy to be fulfilled. That prophesy said that Christ would return before the first generation of his followers passed away, and they interpreted it literally. So, they, too, were waiting and waiting … and waiting. Waiting together. Waiting through suffering and persecution. Waiting in poverty. Waiting with anticipation. Waiting with hope. Waiting for the promised Kingdom of peace and love foretold by the prophets and by Christ himself.
(pause)
Well, it didn’t happen. The first generation came and went, and no parousia – no second coming. And life went on in the Roman Empire, BUT … But the hope and the promise did not die. It was passed on from generation to generation, and down through the ages, believers have been waiting. At times, when prophetic reminders swayed them enough, people have sold all they own in preparation or gathered on hill tops to await the coming of the Lamb. Once, they even overthrew the government of Muster, Germany, convinced that it would become the New Jerusalem – the capital of the Kingdom that was coming.
Most of the time that hasn’t happened. Most of the time Christians have lived “normal” lives. Most of the time they have lived, in large part, like we do. They … and we find a way to muddle through: marrying and having families (if that comes our way), earning money to make ends meet, eating, drinking, sleeping, etc., etc., etc.
Each year at the beginning of Advent, we hear the story of Jesus’ birth again. Each year, we are reminded of the way God broke into the world at an unexpected time in and unexpected way. Each year we hear the promise echoing down the centuries, and we pick up the anticipation that we have left behind as the months wore on. And we get excited. And we sing hosannas. And we wonder at the strange compassion of a God who would become human and dwell with us.
And then life goes on. The trappings of Christmas are put away along with the Holiday spirit of warm generosity, and we take up the task of making it through another year – paying bills (sometimes too big), losing the weight we may have gained, shoveling the snow, and all the rest. And, the anticipation wanes. The hope stays with us, but the sense of expectation fades away.
(pause)
It’s hard to hold onto a sense of expectation. As days and weeks pass we get a sort of “anticipation fatigue.” Our emotional, spiritual, and physical selves get tired of being held at the ready. We come to expect that nothing will change, and we fall back into old patterns - senses dulled, sense of wonder submerged, both overwhelmed by our sense that God’s timing is inexplicable. It is hard to stay alert, especially when you don’t know what is coming or when it will arrive.
That makes it particularly hard to follow the implied command that Jesus gives to his disciples in the guise of a metaphor. “If the owner of the house had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and would not have let his house be broken into. Therefore, you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an unexpected hour.”
How does one do that? How do you prepare for an unknown thief who will come at an unknown time? Do you put in an alarm system, giving it your confidence and giving the thief time to figure out how to circumvent it? Do you hire security guards to watch around the clock, knowing that they will eventually succumb to the same fatigue I mentioned earlier? Would any of that really work against someone determined to get in?
When I was in elementary school, I participated in the Olympics of the Mind (it’s Odyssey of the Mind now … the International Olympic Committee objected to the name). It’s a program that challenges students to solve problems in creative ways, and one of the things they focus on is teaching you to think outside the box. It’s a useful skill, and it’s kind of fun. For example, one task we were given was to name as many keys as we could. The straightforward answers, of course, are things like car keys and house keys, but there are also monkeys and the Florida Keys. I think you can see how kids might enjoy this kind of challenge.
Apply this way of thinking to the question of being ready for a thief. What do you come up with?
(pause)
(I’ll give you a break. You haven’t had much time to think after all.) Here are a couple of ideas that I came up with.
You could leave your home completely unlocked and keep nothing there that someone would want to take. Or you could put up a sign inviting everyone who comes to your home to come in and join you for tea (I’m so sure that one would always work). Or you could work at changing the world around you so that nobody would need to take things from other people.
All three of those ideas require us to think and live in a different way, but isn’t that really what Jesus was challenging us with in his teaching and his living? Remember all those “you have heard it said …, but I say to you …” statements in the Sermon on the Mount. Loving enemies, turning the other cheek, and welcoming the stranger are all still huge reversals in our thinking today. The idea that in the Kingdom of Heaven the poorest, most despised members of society might have the highest status, if you really think about it, still defies our expectations – at least if the way we live is any indication. Yet these things define how we understand our dreams of the ultimate future and our lives as disciples in the present. These are the visions that we get so excited about when Advent comes along. They are the reality at the heart of the promise we hope for and wait for with or without an urgent sense of anticipation.
Often when modern pastors or theologians talk about Christian living we try to verb nouns. We characterize faith as not just a thing we have but a way that we live. We disciple people on their faith journeys. We belong people into the congregation even before they share our beliefs. But in this case, we might do well to noun a verb. Let us take the verb “wait” out of our everyday lives where it becomes a placid, tedious pause empty of action and make it something more exciting. We won’t even have to make up a new meaning. We just need to return to an old one.
“Wait,” as a noun, once meant a night watchman and developed over time into a name for a band of musicians who go around the streets during the Christmas season playing carols. What if we became a wait of sorts, wandering the streets around us while singing out the good news that God came to live with us and will come to be with us once more?
What if we went a bit farther … made our wait a little more hands on? We could share our wealth with those in need. We could care for those who are sick and alone. We could reach out with compassion to those that society despises. We could shine the light of hope and promise into the darkness of despair that sometimes seems to be overwhelming the world.
In that way, we would be living into being in a small way the promise of what is to come. We would be anticipating the Kingdom of God by living as if it were already here – as if peace, love, justice and mercy already ruled the world. And when God’s time is fulfilled, we will be ready and wait-ing to welcome the Son of Man among us.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Willing and Stirred. Building and Becoming.
Celebration Sunday sermon
by Carrie Eikler
Exodus 35:20-29
Who here likes to sing?
Who loves to sing?
I like to sing, there's no doubt about it.
But if you had the choice between hearing me belt out a solo, or say, Marge or Cindy, or Jacob Lewellen sing a solo, you wouldn’t hurt my feelings if you choice one of the Lewellen’s.
And I'm not saying I'm a bad singer, I'm not. I have a decent, steady alto voice (emphasis on decent).
But I was humbled, as I stood next to Elesha Coffman last Sunday at choir practice.whoa. I mean, I can sing…but she can sing.
It was enough to make me want to lower my enthusiastic warbling and let her be the entire alto section
Singing is not my gift. It's more like a stocking stuffer--a nice bonus, but not what gets kids out of bed at 5 oclock on Christmas morning.
I sing because I like to. I'm in the choir because I'm willing. It's not my most favorite thing to do.
If you gave me the choice between choir practice and having the same people around a dinner table for a meal I cooked, I'd probably choose the meal. Sorry, Cindy, but there you have it.
I'm willing to sing in choir. I’m happy to do it.
Bring people around the table? That’s my passion. That’s what stirs my soul.
Willing and stirred.
Before the temple was built in Jerusalem, we have the wandering Hebrews, following Moses, taking their place of worship with them. The tabernacle…a mobile synagogue of sorts.
And the people are bringing their very best offerings…what their hearts were willing to give, but also, what their spirits were stirred to give.
Out of all the scriptural allusions about individuals bringing their gifts to the building up of the reign of God, this is my favorite. Because in a way, it’s not just about building, it’s about becoming the people of God.
It’s about making it beautiful, …a celebration…a stirring of souls
In your hands, you have chosen a beautiful object. For some reason you were drawn to it. Think of this as your gift, a symbol of what stirs you, what it is in this world makes your spirit find its home as you wander and navigate through life. Take a moment, and feel this gift that God has given you.
What stirs you?
[pause]
Call me a cynic, but I believe much of what is done in our congregation, and in many congregations, are done with willing hearts.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s important to have willing workers, or nothing would get done. But done with a spirit that is stirred?…I have a feeling that is done elsewhere.
I’d venture to guess that for many of you, your stirring is seen most clearly and passionately…somewhere else.
Not in the confines of this church building, or on leadership teams, or in meetings.
Maybe it is, but I would guess that if you looked at where you lived most passionately, excitedly…where you were stirred by God’s gifts, it is probably out in your everyday life, where you spend your free time (free time?), your hobbies, your activities…
Your spirits are probably stirred elsewhere
[pause]
And AMEN FOR THAT! Thank you, for offering your gifts to God in the world.
THANK YOU for stirring the spirit among your neighbors, or co-workers, or children, or friends.
THANK YOU for uncovering God out there where God has always been and meeting Christ in the messy and marvelous world, in the broken and blessed world. THANK YOU!
And we as a congregation, made up of diverse people have them as well. It can be a joy and a challenge to see what beautiful addition we might bring as an offering. And while we know we have gifts, it’s all too easy to measure our gift against the gift of other congregations, isn’t it. In the same way compare our individual gifts to others.
We’re not the biggest.
But we welcome the stranger.
You don’t see our church name on hip coffeeshops or billboards or leaflets handed out at parades.
But you do see our members involved in their communities doing the work of justice and peace and beauty.
We shy away from the word evangelism,
but we relish in the word outreach.
We get nervous about the word conversion,
but ponder the significance of transformation.
I don’t hear many of you talk about “personal relationship with Jesus ”
but I’ve seen you sit with each other in love while you struggle to understand how to be a disciple of Christ .
But above all, even if you are simply a willing participant in this church, I believe that this congregation feeds and encourages the stirrings of each of your souls, so you can be the church in the world. We give you strength for the journey.
And I hope that is why you give yourself to this congregation. Not because you are simply willing, but because you are reminded to attend to Christ in the world…in your own soul…to remind you that you are blessed.
Would you agree?
These are our gifts. This is what we bring to the building up of God’s kingdom, this is us becoming the people of God.
In his book, A Hidden Wholeness Parker Palmer speaks about farmers on the Great Plains who would tie a rope from their house to their barn at the first sight of a blizzard.
Occasionally people would freeze to death by simply going to their barns in the middle of a blizzard.
Believing they could find their way back to their homes in the whiteout of snow they would become stranded in their own backyards.
But if they had a rope, it would guide them safely in the midst of the swirling storm.
When I try to flesh out our gifts, have a visual of what we are becoming, it is this image that comes to me, most clearly.
God has made us, as a congregation, into a very good rope.
This rope which leads its members out into the storm and guides them back to the heart of God. That is the offering we bring.
All of us, with our different stirrings, and willing hearts, travel this rope to show God’s peace, love, and grace to a world a wash in a blizzard.
arker Palmer reflects on the importance of such a rope. It helps us catch sight of the soul, the heart of God.
He says, “When we catch sight of the soul, we can survive the blizzard without losing our hope or our way. When we catch sight of the soul, we can become healers in a wounded world—in the family, in the neighborhood, in the workplace—as we are called back to our “hidden wholeness” amid the storms.
As you offer your gifts to the world, we are the rope that helps you catch sight of your soul.
During our time of communion later in the service, you’ll have a chance to attach your gift to an actual rope: Making it beautiful, giving it color and texture, weaving it with your gifts.
Until that time, hold your gift throughout the service and pour into it your prayers, and your hope for our congregation as we hear stories and sing songs celebrating who we are as a congregation.
May God continue to bless us…and celebrate us…in the journey.
As we give thanks to the one who created us and blessed us. Alleluia and Amen.
by Carrie Eikler
Exodus 35:20-29
Who here likes to sing?
Who loves to sing?
I like to sing, there's no doubt about it.
But if you had the choice between hearing me belt out a solo, or say, Marge or Cindy, or Jacob Lewellen sing a solo, you wouldn’t hurt my feelings if you choice one of the Lewellen’s.
And I'm not saying I'm a bad singer, I'm not. I have a decent, steady alto voice (emphasis on decent).
But I was humbled, as I stood next to Elesha Coffman last Sunday at choir practice.whoa. I mean, I can sing…but she can sing.
It was enough to make me want to lower my enthusiastic warbling and let her be the entire alto section
Singing is not my gift. It's more like a stocking stuffer--a nice bonus, but not what gets kids out of bed at 5 oclock on Christmas morning.
I sing because I like to. I'm in the choir because I'm willing. It's not my most favorite thing to do.
If you gave me the choice between choir practice and having the same people around a dinner table for a meal I cooked, I'd probably choose the meal. Sorry, Cindy, but there you have it.
I'm willing to sing in choir. I’m happy to do it.
Bring people around the table? That’s my passion. That’s what stirs my soul.
Willing and stirred.
Before the temple was built in Jerusalem, we have the wandering Hebrews, following Moses, taking their place of worship with them. The tabernacle…a mobile synagogue of sorts.
And the people are bringing their very best offerings…what their hearts were willing to give, but also, what their spirits were stirred to give.
Out of all the scriptural allusions about individuals bringing their gifts to the building up of the reign of God, this is my favorite. Because in a way, it’s not just about building, it’s about becoming the people of God.
It’s about making it beautiful, …a celebration…a stirring of souls
In your hands, you have chosen a beautiful object. For some reason you were drawn to it. Think of this as your gift, a symbol of what stirs you, what it is in this world makes your spirit find its home as you wander and navigate through life. Take a moment, and feel this gift that God has given you.
What stirs you?
[pause]
Call me a cynic, but I believe much of what is done in our congregation, and in many congregations, are done with willing hearts.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s important to have willing workers, or nothing would get done. But done with a spirit that is stirred?…I have a feeling that is done elsewhere.
I’d venture to guess that for many of you, your stirring is seen most clearly and passionately…somewhere else.
Not in the confines of this church building, or on leadership teams, or in meetings.
Maybe it is, but I would guess that if you looked at where you lived most passionately, excitedly…where you were stirred by God’s gifts, it is probably out in your everyday life, where you spend your free time (free time?), your hobbies, your activities…
Your spirits are probably stirred elsewhere
[pause]
And AMEN FOR THAT! Thank you, for offering your gifts to God in the world.
THANK YOU for stirring the spirit among your neighbors, or co-workers, or children, or friends.
THANK YOU for uncovering God out there where God has always been and meeting Christ in the messy and marvelous world, in the broken and blessed world. THANK YOU!
And we as a congregation, made up of diverse people have them as well. It can be a joy and a challenge to see what beautiful addition we might bring as an offering. And while we know we have gifts, it’s all too easy to measure our gift against the gift of other congregations, isn’t it. In the same way compare our individual gifts to others.
We’re not the biggest.
But we welcome the stranger.
You don’t see our church name on hip coffeeshops or billboards or leaflets handed out at parades.
But you do see our members involved in their communities doing the work of justice and peace and beauty.
We shy away from the word evangelism,
but we relish in the word outreach.
We get nervous about the word conversion,
but ponder the significance of transformation.
I don’t hear many of you talk about “personal relationship with Jesus ”
but I’ve seen you sit with each other in love while you struggle to understand how to be a disciple of Christ .
But above all, even if you are simply a willing participant in this church, I believe that this congregation feeds and encourages the stirrings of each of your souls, so you can be the church in the world. We give you strength for the journey.
And I hope that is why you give yourself to this congregation. Not because you are simply willing, but because you are reminded to attend to Christ in the world…in your own soul…to remind you that you are blessed.
Would you agree?
These are our gifts. This is what we bring to the building up of God’s kingdom, this is us becoming the people of God.
In his book, A Hidden Wholeness Parker Palmer speaks about farmers on the Great Plains who would tie a rope from their house to their barn at the first sight of a blizzard.
Occasionally people would freeze to death by simply going to their barns in the middle of a blizzard.
Believing they could find their way back to their homes in the whiteout of snow they would become stranded in their own backyards.
But if they had a rope, it would guide them safely in the midst of the swirling storm.
When I try to flesh out our gifts, have a visual of what we are becoming, it is this image that comes to me, most clearly.
God has made us, as a congregation, into a very good rope.
This rope which leads its members out into the storm and guides them back to the heart of God. That is the offering we bring.
All of us, with our different stirrings, and willing hearts, travel this rope to show God’s peace, love, and grace to a world a wash in a blizzard.
arker Palmer reflects on the importance of such a rope. It helps us catch sight of the soul, the heart of God.
He says, “When we catch sight of the soul, we can survive the blizzard without losing our hope or our way. When we catch sight of the soul, we can become healers in a wounded world—in the family, in the neighborhood, in the workplace—as we are called back to our “hidden wholeness” amid the storms.
As you offer your gifts to the world, we are the rope that helps you catch sight of your soul.
During our time of communion later in the service, you’ll have a chance to attach your gift to an actual rope: Making it beautiful, giving it color and texture, weaving it with your gifts.
Until that time, hold your gift throughout the service and pour into it your prayers, and your hope for our congregation as we hear stories and sing songs celebrating who we are as a congregation.
May God continue to bless us…and celebrate us…in the journey.
As we give thanks to the one who created us and blessed us. Alleluia and Amen.
Sunday, November 14, 2010
It Takes All Sorts
sermon by Torin Eikler
I Corinthians 3:5-11 John 21:4-17
Do you love me? … Feed my lambs.
I don’t know how many of you are very familiar with sheep. I am not … though I have petted the odd ewe here and there, and I have the same “aaww” reaction as most people when I see young lambs stumbling around trying to find their land legs. Usually, I think of them (when I think of them) as pretty dumb animals that just follow the herd from food to water to shelter and back again on their way to becoming sweaters for our backs and chops for our tables. But a few years ago, I heard a sermon all about sheep at one of the Laurelville gatherings we attended, and I learned more about sheep in those 30 minutes than I ever really wanted to know.
As it turns out, sheep are actually quite intelligent. They can be trained almost as well as dogs if one has a mind to do it, and they will recognize their names and come when called (quite valuable, I’m sure, though I don’t really see the advantage to having a 300 pound, hoofed animal in your house). They have excellent memories and can return to pastures or water sources on their own even years after they were there before. They know how to stay safe, for the most part, and shelter themselves from the cold or wind by standing in a crowd and taking turns on the inside where it’s warm and dry. They also recognize faces and have been known to reject a shepherd if that person was unwise enough to shave his beard or dramatically change her hair style.
I also learned a lot about shepherds that day. They may be rough around the edges, but they have always been some of the most skilled and trusted artisans in the world of husbandry. The idyllic image of the shepherd boy sleeping away the day under a tree is not at all related to reality. Shepherding is more than just guiding a flock from pasture to pasture. It also meant living of the land as often as not – finding food, water, and clothing in the wilderness areas where the sheep grazed. And then there were the other things that go into taking care of sheep: helping ewes lamb, stitching wounds and treating disease, carrying sheep that went lame, collecting the wool, and helping animals beyond help ease into death. On top of all that, shepherds are often required to put themselves in harm’s way in order to rescue strays or protect the herd from predators or poachers. The job of a shepherd requires a huge range of skills and a lot of love and dedication.
There was a lot more that I don’t remember, but even this much is enough to make me much happier with Jesus’ tendency to call all of us sheep and himself the shepherd. It is nice to know that he doesn’t mean for us to be mindless, placid beasts herded around until it’s time for us to go to the butcher. He loves us and he wants much more than that for and from us, and it’s comforting to realize that the last thing he expressed to his disciples – and Peter in particular – was his desire to have someone take his place, feeding and caring for us in his place.
Do you love me? …. Tend my sheep.
The thing is ... tending the sheep of Christ is a lot bigger job than feeding lambs. It may have started off okay, but as the followers of the way grew in number and began to spread out from Jerusalem, it became harder and harder for Peter to care for them, even with the help of the other eleven disciples (Matthias having replaced Judas to make up the number). It quickly became clear that more people were needed.
It started with the appointment of seven people called to serve the needs of the poor and the widows in the community. Then there were apostles sent out to proclaim the gospel among those who had not yet heard it. Paul came along and was eventually given authority to work with the gentile believers. And as the numbers of the faithful increased, the central council in Jerusalem grew to more than fifty members in order to keep up. Eventually leaders were named in local communities and others were given the task of traveling around various regions, providing oversight, inspiration, and further teaching to the churches under their care.
Seeing to all the various needs of a spread out group made up of people from all classes and all walks of life is more than just a few people who were more suited to lives devoted to prayer and preaching the word of God. Tending an ever increasing flock takes a whole community of people with different gifts and talents spread out among the sheep. Faithfully building up the church on the foundation laid by Christ takes many hands and hearts and voices.
This is nothing new to us. Many of you have heard the saying, “it takes a village to raise a child,” and similarly, it takes a community to build a church – and by that I don’t mean a building. Anabaptists have always been particularly attentive to this truth, but Christians the world over have understood the reality that William T. Ham expressed when he said, “there are many things which a person can do alone, but being a Christian is not one of them.”
Consider this fable brought back by Mennonite mission workers in Mongolia….
Batzorig lived with his mother and four brothers in a tent on the steppes of Mongolia. They were together all the time, and even more so in the winter when the frosty weather kept them inside most of the day. Batzorig was the youngest of the brothers and the others teased him all of the time. One day it was too much for him, and he stomped out of the tent where he lived in embarrassment and anger.
Outside the protection of the hide walls, the wind was fierce, and in no time at all, Batzorig was shivering, his nose made red from its icy touch whipping past him. Then he heard his mother’s voice calling from behind him, “Batzorig! Come inside; it’s too cold out there! Batzorig!”
Even though he didn’t want to, Batzorig turned slowly and walked toward his mother. She gathered him in through the door flap, and they went inside the warm tent together. Batzorig immediately began to glare at his brothers as they sat around the warm fireplace talking and laughing happily, but before he could say anything, his mother handed him an arrow, which he took respectfully with both hands. Each of his brothers did the same when she came around to them.
“I want you to break this arrow,” the mother told her sons. The crisp sound of arrows breaking filled the tent … snap … snap … snap … snap … snap … as each of the brothers broke his arrow in turn. Then she gathered up the broken arrows. She handed the whole bunch to one of her sons and told him to break the cluster of arrows. Try as he might he could not, and when he gave up, she handed the bundle to the next son, asking the same thing of him. Each of the brothers tried in turn, and none of them could break the arrows.
At this, the mother said, “You all have the same mother. Listen to me. Just as you were able to easily break the one arrow, if you go ahead divided and separate, you, too, will find your strength fails you. But, like the cluster of arrows, if you are together, you will not easily be broken.”
If we are to be the church, the body of Christ, then we must walk together in community, supporting each other, leaning on the arms of brothers and sisters in our times of struggle and offering our own arms to meet another’s need when her path leads down a dark and difficult road. No one of us can make our spiritual journey alone. We need each other. If we are to be faithful to the Christ we follow, the Christ who has loved us and loves us still, the Christ we love, then we must build each other up, tending to one another in love so that, together, we can serve each other and the world as Christ has taught us. It’s not just some Peter’s job. It belongs to all of us.
Do you love me? … Feed my sheep.
Now here’s a question … just who are the sheep? Are they you and me? Are they all of us Anabaptists? All of us Christians? Is it what one believes or how one lives that makes that person a sheep? Who do you think the Christ who lived and died for the sake of all humanity – even all creation – would see as part of his flock?
I think you know the answer. The shepherd spends time and energy, sometimes risking everything to restore even one weak, suffering sheep or to reach the member of the flock that has wondered off into danger and bring it back home. If the people Jesus spent his time and energy … his very life to restore – prostitutes, tax collectors, blind, lame, dirty, possessed, leprous outcasts – are any indication, I think it’s safe to say that everyone is a sheep. And if the task of tending the sheep belongs to all of us – to the gathered body of Christ, then we are called to be caring for all of God’s children.
So what does that mean? It could mean that we are to tend the spiritual needs of those around us. I haven’t spoken much about that this morning, but it’s the traditional interpretation of Jesus’ commission to Peter. We are to bind up the wounds of those who have suffered spiritual injuries. We are to ease the pain and distress of those in despair. We are to comfort and support the weak and the lost, shepherding them – sometimes carrying them - on to those green pastures beside still water. And, we are to help bring forth new life: welcoming brothers and sisters new to the body of Christ, searching out and naming gifts and talents, and encouraging … calling … sometimes even pulling one another forward along new paths in our spiritual journeys.
That’s part of it – a big part, I think … but Jesus used such down to earth imagery and spent so much of his time caring for people’s bodies that I don’t think we can completely spiritualize this tending/feeding/shepherding thing. When people don’t get basic needs like food or love or protection met, they tend to focus their energy on those needs. Sometimes, that includes turning more and more toward God. More often it doesn’t, and if we aspire to tend people’s spiritual needs, we need to meet their physical and emotional needs first … or at least at the same time.
We need to feed people when they are hungry. We need to care for people who are sick or injured or lonely or depressed. We need to help people find safety and security (physical and emotional). That’s the other part of our task – the other part of our calling as followers of the Christ we love.
That’s big – that task of feeding the lambs. This calling to tend Christ’s sheep, when we look at the whole of it, it’s really big and really overwhelming … for any one or two or three of us. But just as there were others to help do the work in Peter’s time, there are more than just a few of us. There is more than just this congregation. The body of Christ spans the globe and reaches out to our communities with myriad hands, and we are all fellow workers in God’s field. We are all fellow workers building up the Realm of God one stone – one person at a time.
The true gift, the grace of God for our mission is that we don’t have to take it all on. We don’t have to start at the beginning. The foundation has already been laid … and by a builder far more skilled than any of us. We don’t have to work alone, for we are many and the Spirit moves and breathes into the work and the workers alike inspiring, refreshing, and steadying all of it and all of us along the way.
Each one of us builds in a different way. Each of us has our own sense of God’s work in this world and our own way to lend it a hand. And we work together as we build; doing what is ours to do as others do what is theirs to do. And we tend the sheep together, offering our own strength and compassion to meet the needs of the Children of God in our midst.
And in the end, whenever our struggles and frustrations threaten discouragement or our successes and accomplishments bring complacency, Christ appears on our shoreline, tends our needs, and asks … do you love me?
I Corinthians 3:5-11 John 21:4-17
Do you love me? … Feed my lambs.
I don’t know how many of you are very familiar with sheep. I am not … though I have petted the odd ewe here and there, and I have the same “aaww” reaction as most people when I see young lambs stumbling around trying to find their land legs. Usually, I think of them (when I think of them) as pretty dumb animals that just follow the herd from food to water to shelter and back again on their way to becoming sweaters for our backs and chops for our tables. But a few years ago, I heard a sermon all about sheep at one of the Laurelville gatherings we attended, and I learned more about sheep in those 30 minutes than I ever really wanted to know.
As it turns out, sheep are actually quite intelligent. They can be trained almost as well as dogs if one has a mind to do it, and they will recognize their names and come when called (quite valuable, I’m sure, though I don’t really see the advantage to having a 300 pound, hoofed animal in your house). They have excellent memories and can return to pastures or water sources on their own even years after they were there before. They know how to stay safe, for the most part, and shelter themselves from the cold or wind by standing in a crowd and taking turns on the inside where it’s warm and dry. They also recognize faces and have been known to reject a shepherd if that person was unwise enough to shave his beard or dramatically change her hair style.
I also learned a lot about shepherds that day. They may be rough around the edges, but they have always been some of the most skilled and trusted artisans in the world of husbandry. The idyllic image of the shepherd boy sleeping away the day under a tree is not at all related to reality. Shepherding is more than just guiding a flock from pasture to pasture. It also meant living of the land as often as not – finding food, water, and clothing in the wilderness areas where the sheep grazed. And then there were the other things that go into taking care of sheep: helping ewes lamb, stitching wounds and treating disease, carrying sheep that went lame, collecting the wool, and helping animals beyond help ease into death. On top of all that, shepherds are often required to put themselves in harm’s way in order to rescue strays or protect the herd from predators or poachers. The job of a shepherd requires a huge range of skills and a lot of love and dedication.
There was a lot more that I don’t remember, but even this much is enough to make me much happier with Jesus’ tendency to call all of us sheep and himself the shepherd. It is nice to know that he doesn’t mean for us to be mindless, placid beasts herded around until it’s time for us to go to the butcher. He loves us and he wants much more than that for and from us, and it’s comforting to realize that the last thing he expressed to his disciples – and Peter in particular – was his desire to have someone take his place, feeding and caring for us in his place.
Do you love me? …. Tend my sheep.
The thing is ... tending the sheep of Christ is a lot bigger job than feeding lambs. It may have started off okay, but as the followers of the way grew in number and began to spread out from Jerusalem, it became harder and harder for Peter to care for them, even with the help of the other eleven disciples (Matthias having replaced Judas to make up the number). It quickly became clear that more people were needed.
It started with the appointment of seven people called to serve the needs of the poor and the widows in the community. Then there were apostles sent out to proclaim the gospel among those who had not yet heard it. Paul came along and was eventually given authority to work with the gentile believers. And as the numbers of the faithful increased, the central council in Jerusalem grew to more than fifty members in order to keep up. Eventually leaders were named in local communities and others were given the task of traveling around various regions, providing oversight, inspiration, and further teaching to the churches under their care.
Seeing to all the various needs of a spread out group made up of people from all classes and all walks of life is more than just a few people who were more suited to lives devoted to prayer and preaching the word of God. Tending an ever increasing flock takes a whole community of people with different gifts and talents spread out among the sheep. Faithfully building up the church on the foundation laid by Christ takes many hands and hearts and voices.
This is nothing new to us. Many of you have heard the saying, “it takes a village to raise a child,” and similarly, it takes a community to build a church – and by that I don’t mean a building. Anabaptists have always been particularly attentive to this truth, but Christians the world over have understood the reality that William T. Ham expressed when he said, “there are many things which a person can do alone, but being a Christian is not one of them.”
Consider this fable brought back by Mennonite mission workers in Mongolia….
Batzorig lived with his mother and four brothers in a tent on the steppes of Mongolia. They were together all the time, and even more so in the winter when the frosty weather kept them inside most of the day. Batzorig was the youngest of the brothers and the others teased him all of the time. One day it was too much for him, and he stomped out of the tent where he lived in embarrassment and anger.
Outside the protection of the hide walls, the wind was fierce, and in no time at all, Batzorig was shivering, his nose made red from its icy touch whipping past him. Then he heard his mother’s voice calling from behind him, “Batzorig! Come inside; it’s too cold out there! Batzorig!”
Even though he didn’t want to, Batzorig turned slowly and walked toward his mother. She gathered him in through the door flap, and they went inside the warm tent together. Batzorig immediately began to glare at his brothers as they sat around the warm fireplace talking and laughing happily, but before he could say anything, his mother handed him an arrow, which he took respectfully with both hands. Each of his brothers did the same when she came around to them.
“I want you to break this arrow,” the mother told her sons. The crisp sound of arrows breaking filled the tent … snap … snap … snap … snap … snap … as each of the brothers broke his arrow in turn. Then she gathered up the broken arrows. She handed the whole bunch to one of her sons and told him to break the cluster of arrows. Try as he might he could not, and when he gave up, she handed the bundle to the next son, asking the same thing of him. Each of the brothers tried in turn, and none of them could break the arrows.
At this, the mother said, “You all have the same mother. Listen to me. Just as you were able to easily break the one arrow, if you go ahead divided and separate, you, too, will find your strength fails you. But, like the cluster of arrows, if you are together, you will not easily be broken.”
If we are to be the church, the body of Christ, then we must walk together in community, supporting each other, leaning on the arms of brothers and sisters in our times of struggle and offering our own arms to meet another’s need when her path leads down a dark and difficult road. No one of us can make our spiritual journey alone. We need each other. If we are to be faithful to the Christ we follow, the Christ who has loved us and loves us still, the Christ we love, then we must build each other up, tending to one another in love so that, together, we can serve each other and the world as Christ has taught us. It’s not just some Peter’s job. It belongs to all of us.
Do you love me? … Feed my sheep.
Now here’s a question … just who are the sheep? Are they you and me? Are they all of us Anabaptists? All of us Christians? Is it what one believes or how one lives that makes that person a sheep? Who do you think the Christ who lived and died for the sake of all humanity – even all creation – would see as part of his flock?
I think you know the answer. The shepherd spends time and energy, sometimes risking everything to restore even one weak, suffering sheep or to reach the member of the flock that has wondered off into danger and bring it back home. If the people Jesus spent his time and energy … his very life to restore – prostitutes, tax collectors, blind, lame, dirty, possessed, leprous outcasts – are any indication, I think it’s safe to say that everyone is a sheep. And if the task of tending the sheep belongs to all of us – to the gathered body of Christ, then we are called to be caring for all of God’s children.
So what does that mean? It could mean that we are to tend the spiritual needs of those around us. I haven’t spoken much about that this morning, but it’s the traditional interpretation of Jesus’ commission to Peter. We are to bind up the wounds of those who have suffered spiritual injuries. We are to ease the pain and distress of those in despair. We are to comfort and support the weak and the lost, shepherding them – sometimes carrying them - on to those green pastures beside still water. And, we are to help bring forth new life: welcoming brothers and sisters new to the body of Christ, searching out and naming gifts and talents, and encouraging … calling … sometimes even pulling one another forward along new paths in our spiritual journeys.
That’s part of it – a big part, I think … but Jesus used such down to earth imagery and spent so much of his time caring for people’s bodies that I don’t think we can completely spiritualize this tending/feeding/shepherding thing. When people don’t get basic needs like food or love or protection met, they tend to focus their energy on those needs. Sometimes, that includes turning more and more toward God. More often it doesn’t, and if we aspire to tend people’s spiritual needs, we need to meet their physical and emotional needs first … or at least at the same time.
We need to feed people when they are hungry. We need to care for people who are sick or injured or lonely or depressed. We need to help people find safety and security (physical and emotional). That’s the other part of our task – the other part of our calling as followers of the Christ we love.
That’s big – that task of feeding the lambs. This calling to tend Christ’s sheep, when we look at the whole of it, it’s really big and really overwhelming … for any one or two or three of us. But just as there were others to help do the work in Peter’s time, there are more than just a few of us. There is more than just this congregation. The body of Christ spans the globe and reaches out to our communities with myriad hands, and we are all fellow workers in God’s field. We are all fellow workers building up the Realm of God one stone – one person at a time.
The true gift, the grace of God for our mission is that we don’t have to take it all on. We don’t have to start at the beginning. The foundation has already been laid … and by a builder far more skilled than any of us. We don’t have to work alone, for we are many and the Spirit moves and breathes into the work and the workers alike inspiring, refreshing, and steadying all of it and all of us along the way.
Each one of us builds in a different way. Each of us has our own sense of God’s work in this world and our own way to lend it a hand. And we work together as we build; doing what is ours to do as others do what is theirs to do. And we tend the sheep together, offering our own strength and compassion to meet the needs of the Children of God in our midst.
And in the end, whenever our struggles and frustrations threaten discouragement or our successes and accomplishments bring complacency, Christ appears on our shoreline, tends our needs, and asks … do you love me?
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Have Mercy
sermon by Torin Eikler
Luke 18:9-14
Parables are tricky things. They can be hard to understand because they have deal with a whole knot of concepts all together, and they also speak to us in different ways at different times in our lives. That’s nothing new to most of us. We’ve probably all gotten lost in one before – gotten all tied up in that knot as we’ve tried to tease out the meaning. Sometimes, I just want to say, “Lord, have mercy.” But, I think that’s part of the reason that Jesus used them. They keep us coming back again and again as we pick at them and as they pick at us.
And they do pick at us, don’t they. They catch us out in ways that we could not have guessed before hearing them. We find ourselves led down an easy path and then we realize that there is no way back – that the nice, predictable story we’re hearing is really about us and we can’t get out of it without looking at ourselves and rewriting the main character. As one of my colleagues is fond of saying, “parables should come with a surgeon general’s note: warning…you are about to enter a trap.”
They are not for the faint of spirit, but they are wonderfully revealing mirrors once the fog has been cleared away.
So, let’s do a little wiping. There are some cultural details in the background of this parable that it might be helpful to understand. The presence of these two different men at prayer in the Temple would not have been all that uncommon. Twice a day the priests offered a sacrifice of atonement for the sins of the chosen people. When they had finished the messy part, they threw handfuls of incense on the altar fire, and the prayers of those gathered in the Temple were carried to the ears of God on the rising plumes of smoke. On this particular day, there happened to be a Pharisee and a tax collector among the hundreds gathered for the ceremony.
Also, the fact that both the men were standing off away from the crowd had as much to do with socio-cultural concerns as it did with any spiritual attitude on their own parts. Pharisees tried to follow as many of the laws in the Torah as they could, and there was a real risk that these devout men would become unclean if they touched anyone in the crowd. Tax collectors, on the other hand, were servants of the empire who were considered to be turncoat collaborators. Nobody welcomed their presence. The crowd would have opened space around them no matter where they stood. I would stand at the back too if that was going to happen to me.
One last thing … the first and last verses we heard today were not really part of the parable. They are interpretive notes about its meaning. They can be helpful … but they can also limit the power of the parable and what it has to say to us. Listen again to the parable as it would have been told….
Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee, standing by himself, was praying thus, “God, I thank you that I am not like other people: thieves, rogues, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give a tenth of all my income.” But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even look up to heaven, but was beating his breast and saying, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner!” I tell you, this man went home justified rather than the other.
Is this a story about how we should pray? Should we pray standing with arms outstretched and eyes and voice raised to the heavens? Should we pray hunched over with eyes downcast, beating our chests? If we happened to look around during prayer one Sunday morning and saw someone praying either way, we would certainly be surprised. But most people prayed in just the same way the Pharisee did unless they were caught up in deep grief. Then, they assumed the position of the tax collector.
I don’t think this really about how we stand or sit or use our hands, and there is an old poem by Sam Walter Foss that shows us rather humorously how unimportant all that really is ….
"The proper way for man to pray,"
said Deacon Lemuel Keyes,
"And the only proper attitude
is down upon his knees."
"No, I should say the way to pray,"
said Reverend Dr Wise,
"Is standing straight with outstretched arms,
and rapt & upturned eyes."
"Oh no, no, no!" said Elder Slow,
"such posture is too proud;
A man should pray with eyes fast closed,
and head contritely bowed."
"It seems to me his hands should be
austerely clasped in front,
With both thumbs pointing to the ground,"
said Reverend Dr Blunt.
"Las' year I fell in Hodgkin's well
head first," said Cyrus Brown.
"With both my heels a-stickin' up,
my head a-pointin' down;
"An' I made a prayer right then an' there,
best prayer I ever said.
The best darn prayer I ever prayed,
a-standin' on my head!"
I guess we should all pray in the upside down position…. But let’s go a little deeper because the parable does seem to have something to say about how we approach God when we pray. Even when we are not underwater, the attitude we have does matter.
I have heard teaching and preaching that tell me this story is all about the difference between pride and humility. Jesus was, just as Luke tells us, warning about the dangers of self-importance and self-righteousness and extolling the virtues of humility – of recognizing that we are all sinners who have fallen short. I think that’s a good point.
On the other hand, I don’t think it’s bad to have confidence in ourselves. We know that we are not perfect, but we also know that we are not entirely bad either. Our lives are a messy hodge-podge of sin and virtue, purity and corruption, innocence and guilt. To take the position that we have no good thing to celebrate is just as proud as claiming righteousness.
Still I find myself rankled by the Pharisee’s prayer. It’s less about himself and more about what he is not. It’s a prayer of comparison: “Thank you that I am not like other people,” and it feels judgmental and pretentious to me. There is no sense that he values those “other people” at all. To him they are worthless, having made unacceptable choices. And there is no sense of compassion or mercy because he could never put himself in their shoes. He wouldn’t even try.
The other prayer, though, the short, simple one by the tax collector is just as selfish. It’s all about him … but with one big difference. He is looking squarely at himself, not comparing himself to others. I get no sense of judgment from him, and there is certainly no pretension in his words. I don’t know if he would have compassion for others. His job certainly lent itself to indifference. But I get the sense that he could empathize with the struggles of others. It may be the conflict between doing his job and concern for others that led him to the Temple. Asking for mercy from God he may also have been longing for forgiveness from those he taxed as well.
Maybe… maybe not, but is it any wonder that the one who seemed to think he needed nothing from any of “those people” got nothing and the one who judged himself unworthy received mercy? That’s the nature of grace after all … isn’t it? It comes – just as Jesus did – to the lost ones. It takes more joy in the sinner who turns to God than in the ninety-nine devout, righteous people. But that leaves me wondering ….
Most of Jesus parables are explicitly or implicitly about the Kingdom of God, and the question of how we pray seems less germane – less relevant to that Kingdom. The question of justice and mercy though is a common theme. So what about that tax collector? What about the grace he received?
Imagine that you are in the Temple in Jerusalem and you see this story playing out in front of you. You know both the men involved. One is a nice, religious layman who lives down the street from you. He looks after his family well, keeps the 613 rules and gives over and above the required amount to satisfy his social and religious obligations. The other is the man who collects your taxes. Like everyone else, you despise him, but you are intrigued to see him beating his chest like a mother who has lost a child and asking God for mercy. You wonder what’s going on, but you are about to dismiss the sight as just another example of strange behavior from a man that everyone despises when you overhear Jesus telling his followers that the taxman is justified by God rather than the religious layman. It makes you think, and you leave the Temple pondering what, exactly, Jesus meant.
A week later, you are in the Temple again and the same two people are there. During the week, your neighbor continued his excellent behavior. He also paid for medical treatment of another neighbor’s sick son and arranged for a bag of wheat to be delivered to an elderly widow a couple of streets over.
You happened to know that the tax collector had added to his wealth during the week, making sure that the elderly widow handed over some of the wheat sent to her by the religious layman. And you noticed that he had a new chariot with a local prostitute inside waiting outside the Temple.
Now you’re curious. You leave off your own praying to watch the scene unfold, and … the same thing happens. The layman prays up front in the proper fashion. The taxman beats his chest and asks God for mercy.
You wonder, “What would Jesus make of that?”
Another week goes by, and you have paid special attention to the two men. You head back to the temple guessing they’ll both be there again. During the week, the Pharisee had taken his wife to visit her elderly mother and made sure there was enough firewood and food for the mother's comfort. He also hired two extra workers on his farm not because he needed them but because they needed some extra money in order to buy bread for their families.
The taxman gave back the wheat he had taken from the elderly widow and put some of his own money into an account on her behalf, BUT he still took advantage of the rest of the community, AND he arrived at the Temple in his chariot with a local prostitute again.
Once again Pharisee prayed his prayer and the taxman beat his chest and asked God for mercy.
What are you thinking? Are you questioning the tax collector’s sincerity? What if the saga continued – week after week, the Pharisee continued to live an exemplary life while the tax collector only does a few good things here and there? Do you think the tax collector’s prayer for mercy would continue to be answered? Would he continue to be justified – continue to be forgiven – continue to receive grace?
What do you think Jesus would say?
For myself, I think I would wonder. I think I would start to dismiss the prayers of the tax collector as a sham … a PR stunt, maybe, designed to make us all feel a little warmth toward him so that he could more easily rip us off. If he really meant those prayers, if he really received mercy like Jesus said, he would change his ways. He would start taking care of other people for real instead of just every once in awhile. He would stop seeing prostitutes and start living more like the Pharisee.
I would judge him unworthy of mercy, undeserving of grace. And what would Jesus say then?
What would that man who wielded the power of compassion, who taught about infinite forgiveness, who gave his life for the sake of unconditional love tell his followers about me?
Lord, have mercy.
And then have mercy.
And then have mercy again….
Luke 18:9-14
Parables are tricky things. They can be hard to understand because they have deal with a whole knot of concepts all together, and they also speak to us in different ways at different times in our lives. That’s nothing new to most of us. We’ve probably all gotten lost in one before – gotten all tied up in that knot as we’ve tried to tease out the meaning. Sometimes, I just want to say, “Lord, have mercy.” But, I think that’s part of the reason that Jesus used them. They keep us coming back again and again as we pick at them and as they pick at us.
And they do pick at us, don’t they. They catch us out in ways that we could not have guessed before hearing them. We find ourselves led down an easy path and then we realize that there is no way back – that the nice, predictable story we’re hearing is really about us and we can’t get out of it without looking at ourselves and rewriting the main character. As one of my colleagues is fond of saying, “parables should come with a surgeon general’s note: warning…you are about to enter a trap.”
They are not for the faint of spirit, but they are wonderfully revealing mirrors once the fog has been cleared away.
So, let’s do a little wiping. There are some cultural details in the background of this parable that it might be helpful to understand. The presence of these two different men at prayer in the Temple would not have been all that uncommon. Twice a day the priests offered a sacrifice of atonement for the sins of the chosen people. When they had finished the messy part, they threw handfuls of incense on the altar fire, and the prayers of those gathered in the Temple were carried to the ears of God on the rising plumes of smoke. On this particular day, there happened to be a Pharisee and a tax collector among the hundreds gathered for the ceremony.
Also, the fact that both the men were standing off away from the crowd had as much to do with socio-cultural concerns as it did with any spiritual attitude on their own parts. Pharisees tried to follow as many of the laws in the Torah as they could, and there was a real risk that these devout men would become unclean if they touched anyone in the crowd. Tax collectors, on the other hand, were servants of the empire who were considered to be turncoat collaborators. Nobody welcomed their presence. The crowd would have opened space around them no matter where they stood. I would stand at the back too if that was going to happen to me.
One last thing … the first and last verses we heard today were not really part of the parable. They are interpretive notes about its meaning. They can be helpful … but they can also limit the power of the parable and what it has to say to us. Listen again to the parable as it would have been told….
Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee, standing by himself, was praying thus, “God, I thank you that I am not like other people: thieves, rogues, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give a tenth of all my income.” But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even look up to heaven, but was beating his breast and saying, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner!” I tell you, this man went home justified rather than the other.
Is this a story about how we should pray? Should we pray standing with arms outstretched and eyes and voice raised to the heavens? Should we pray hunched over with eyes downcast, beating our chests? If we happened to look around during prayer one Sunday morning and saw someone praying either way, we would certainly be surprised. But most people prayed in just the same way the Pharisee did unless they were caught up in deep grief. Then, they assumed the position of the tax collector.
I don’t think this really about how we stand or sit or use our hands, and there is an old poem by Sam Walter Foss that shows us rather humorously how unimportant all that really is ….
"The proper way for man to pray,"
said Deacon Lemuel Keyes,
"And the only proper attitude
is down upon his knees."
"No, I should say the way to pray,"
said Reverend Dr Wise,
"Is standing straight with outstretched arms,
and rapt & upturned eyes."
"Oh no, no, no!" said Elder Slow,
"such posture is too proud;
A man should pray with eyes fast closed,
and head contritely bowed."
"It seems to me his hands should be
austerely clasped in front,
With both thumbs pointing to the ground,"
said Reverend Dr Blunt.
"Las' year I fell in Hodgkin's well
head first," said Cyrus Brown.
"With both my heels a-stickin' up,
my head a-pointin' down;
"An' I made a prayer right then an' there,
best prayer I ever said.
The best darn prayer I ever prayed,
a-standin' on my head!"
I guess we should all pray in the upside down position…. But let’s go a little deeper because the parable does seem to have something to say about how we approach God when we pray. Even when we are not underwater, the attitude we have does matter.
I have heard teaching and preaching that tell me this story is all about the difference between pride and humility. Jesus was, just as Luke tells us, warning about the dangers of self-importance and self-righteousness and extolling the virtues of humility – of recognizing that we are all sinners who have fallen short. I think that’s a good point.
On the other hand, I don’t think it’s bad to have confidence in ourselves. We know that we are not perfect, but we also know that we are not entirely bad either. Our lives are a messy hodge-podge of sin and virtue, purity and corruption, innocence and guilt. To take the position that we have no good thing to celebrate is just as proud as claiming righteousness.
Still I find myself rankled by the Pharisee’s prayer. It’s less about himself and more about what he is not. It’s a prayer of comparison: “Thank you that I am not like other people,” and it feels judgmental and pretentious to me. There is no sense that he values those “other people” at all. To him they are worthless, having made unacceptable choices. And there is no sense of compassion or mercy because he could never put himself in their shoes. He wouldn’t even try.
The other prayer, though, the short, simple one by the tax collector is just as selfish. It’s all about him … but with one big difference. He is looking squarely at himself, not comparing himself to others. I get no sense of judgment from him, and there is certainly no pretension in his words. I don’t know if he would have compassion for others. His job certainly lent itself to indifference. But I get the sense that he could empathize with the struggles of others. It may be the conflict between doing his job and concern for others that led him to the Temple. Asking for mercy from God he may also have been longing for forgiveness from those he taxed as well.
Maybe… maybe not, but is it any wonder that the one who seemed to think he needed nothing from any of “those people” got nothing and the one who judged himself unworthy received mercy? That’s the nature of grace after all … isn’t it? It comes – just as Jesus did – to the lost ones. It takes more joy in the sinner who turns to God than in the ninety-nine devout, righteous people. But that leaves me wondering ….
Most of Jesus parables are explicitly or implicitly about the Kingdom of God, and the question of how we pray seems less germane – less relevant to that Kingdom. The question of justice and mercy though is a common theme. So what about that tax collector? What about the grace he received?
Imagine that you are in the Temple in Jerusalem and you see this story playing out in front of you. You know both the men involved. One is a nice, religious layman who lives down the street from you. He looks after his family well, keeps the 613 rules and gives over and above the required amount to satisfy his social and religious obligations. The other is the man who collects your taxes. Like everyone else, you despise him, but you are intrigued to see him beating his chest like a mother who has lost a child and asking God for mercy. You wonder what’s going on, but you are about to dismiss the sight as just another example of strange behavior from a man that everyone despises when you overhear Jesus telling his followers that the taxman is justified by God rather than the religious layman. It makes you think, and you leave the Temple pondering what, exactly, Jesus meant.
A week later, you are in the Temple again and the same two people are there. During the week, your neighbor continued his excellent behavior. He also paid for medical treatment of another neighbor’s sick son and arranged for a bag of wheat to be delivered to an elderly widow a couple of streets over.
You happened to know that the tax collector had added to his wealth during the week, making sure that the elderly widow handed over some of the wheat sent to her by the religious layman. And you noticed that he had a new chariot with a local prostitute inside waiting outside the Temple.
Now you’re curious. You leave off your own praying to watch the scene unfold, and … the same thing happens. The layman prays up front in the proper fashion. The taxman beats his chest and asks God for mercy.
You wonder, “What would Jesus make of that?”
Another week goes by, and you have paid special attention to the two men. You head back to the temple guessing they’ll both be there again. During the week, the Pharisee had taken his wife to visit her elderly mother and made sure there was enough firewood and food for the mother's comfort. He also hired two extra workers on his farm not because he needed them but because they needed some extra money in order to buy bread for their families.
The taxman gave back the wheat he had taken from the elderly widow and put some of his own money into an account on her behalf, BUT he still took advantage of the rest of the community, AND he arrived at the Temple in his chariot with a local prostitute again.
Once again Pharisee prayed his prayer and the taxman beat his chest and asked God for mercy.
What are you thinking? Are you questioning the tax collector’s sincerity? What if the saga continued – week after week, the Pharisee continued to live an exemplary life while the tax collector only does a few good things here and there? Do you think the tax collector’s prayer for mercy would continue to be answered? Would he continue to be justified – continue to be forgiven – continue to receive grace?
What do you think Jesus would say?
For myself, I think I would wonder. I think I would start to dismiss the prayers of the tax collector as a sham … a PR stunt, maybe, designed to make us all feel a little warmth toward him so that he could more easily rip us off. If he really meant those prayers, if he really received mercy like Jesus said, he would change his ways. He would start taking care of other people for real instead of just every once in awhile. He would stop seeing prostitutes and start living more like the Pharisee.
I would judge him unworthy of mercy, undeserving of grace. And what would Jesus say then?
What would that man who wielded the power of compassion, who taught about infinite forgiveness, who gave his life for the sake of unconditional love tell his followers about me?
Lord, have mercy.
And then have mercy.
And then have mercy again….
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Pray always and don't lose heart
Sermon by Carrie Eikler
Luke 18:1-8
October 17, 2010
I don’t know much about stem cells.
There are probably a good number of you in here that know more than I do about stem cells.
After all, I am a practical theologian, not a scientist.
So when the flyers came in the mail when I was pregnant with Sebastian saying that once he was born, we could preserve the blood from his umbilical cord
--preserve the stem cells--I knew there had to be some catch.
Another way for us to drop thousands of dollars on the baby industry.
“Fearing” us into buying something that may, someday, be needed.
They said it could help him in the future if he developed a condition that stem cells could somehow treat.
*Really, I don’t know how it works. They just said it.
Torin and I thought, we’d take our chances and pray our child would forgive us if that unfortunate event ever did occur, and we had not stored his umbilical cord blood for a mere $100 a month fee.
And when the company providing this service followed up the flyers with a phone call, I was ready to give them a polite no thank you please don’t call again.
But I got more information from them as they talked.
They told me that if the child had an immediate relative with a disease that stem cells could possibly be used in treating,
that there was a charitable arm of the company that would store the cells at no cost for that relative.
No $100 a month handling fee. No charges. They would just do it.
*My mom had been recently diagnosed with leukemia.
Stem cells have been known to be effective in treating leukemia.
If things got really bad with her disease, Sebastian’s umbilical cord stem cells could be a potential option in his grandmother’s treatment.
So somewhere, in some freezer, there is a vile of blood that may, be used to help treat her disease.
Like a gift from grandson to grandmother.
Like a vile of prayers. Frozen. Ready to be thawed if… need be.
Hoping it will never need to be.
*Unlike most salespeople, I’m glad they kept knocking.
This is another thing I know about stem cells.
We all have them all over our body.
Most of us hear the loaded term “embryonic stem cells” when
the politicians start debating over the use of these cells in research, but really they’re everywhere in our body. And stem cells do two things: the regenerate and they differentiate,
meaning, they make more of themselves, and they become lots of different things.
*And these stem cells do amazing things.
Scientists have even taken a heart from the cadaver of a rat, wash out the dead cells, inject it with stem cells, and after great lengths, it started beating.
They brought a heart back to life.
*I know it can sound a bit like Frankenstein, just in time for the Halloween season, right?
But when Jesus talks about this widow as an example of always praying and never losing heart,
I know he is not talking about a real one, a real heart.
I know another translation for “never lose heart” is also “never give up” “keep being persistent.”
Pray always. Don’t lose heart.
*I don’t know why I can’t get stem cells out of my mind as I think about this scripture.
I even asked Torin, “Do you see any relationship between the widow and the judge and heart stem cells?”
*You can image the look he gave me.
*Because really, what we’re talking about here is prayer.
About constantly going to God in prayer,
banging on the door, demanding justice,
coming with viles of prayer ready to thaw and lay them on the door step.
Willing them to live. To beat. To cure and heal.
It’s no surprise that how we understand prayer reflects a lot about how we understand God.
Theologian Marjorie Suchocki reflects on some major ways we think of God by how we think of prayer.
I wonder if any of these sound familiar to you?
Sometimes we imagine God as the great genie in Aladdin’s bottle,
with prayer being the magic rubbing that draws the genie forth to do our bidding.
Or at times we approach God as our divine secretary,
ready to give God our memo for the day, which are our requests and prayers.
In seeing God as genie and God as secretary, we believe that God has the power to do the requests,
but the control rests in the one doing the asking.
We have the control.
Then there is God as the divine egoist.
This is when we think about prayer in terms of “God likes to be asked”
God could do all we want, if we stroke God’s ego enough.
Or similarly, we treat God like a king holding audience, who might grant a petitioner a boon.
This king knows what the petitioner wants, but is just waiting to act until properly asked.
Of course, these are extremes—caricatures.
But who among us has not wondered how prayer works? If it works? How God works with prayers? We often see ourselves in the scripture as the widow banging on God’s door demanding justice,
or healing, or fortunate blessings.
But God is not being likened to this judge in the scripture
but rather reflected on as the opposite of the judge.
If this man who neglects his duty as judge,
to care for widows and orphans, to listen and deal wisely…
if even this man answers, even after a long while, then don’t you think God will answer your prayers, and more quickly?
Well, don’t you?
I think we want to say “yes.”
I think we might move a notch up the honesty scale if we sigh “I hope so.”
And we will join the majority of the faithful if we collapse in the doorway
with our knuckles bruised from knocking so much, crying out “I just don’t know.”
*I like what George Hermanson shares about this scripture in a sermon of his:
He says “I can't answer for Jesus, but it has been true in my own limited experience of prayer that justice does not come quickly.
It has also been true that I am not very good at always praying and never giving up.
And it is also true that occasionally the process of praying has changed me,
changed what I have been praying for as I have seen how my prayers
were as self-centred as the unjust judge…”
He says, “The moral of the story is NOT about the judge finally responding.
The moral is about the widow's persistence for justice during the long period of the judge not responding and giving no indication that he ever would.”
(http://www.holytextures.com/2010/10/luke-18-1-8-year-c-pentecost-october-16-october-22-proper-24-ordinary-time-29-sermon.html)
*I started this week off by witnessing the death of our brother, Doug Porter.
Doug had a heart attack, and after his family had all arrived, they took him off the ventilator sustaining his life.
He went quickly, surrounded by love.
His heart was tired. It needed to rest.
His wife Lou and his family prayed that Doug would gain strength and remain with them.
It sounds like something we would all pray, doesn’t it?
But the prayer didn’t stop there.
They also prayed that if it Doug couldn’t stay in this life,
they asked God to strengthen them and their hearts to continue on without him.
*And I guess here is that strange connection for me, how prayers like this, hearken me back to stem cells.
Prayers regenerate and differentiate,
they make more of themselves
and they become many different things.
Similarly, Hermanson reflects on two aspects of prayer
• First, “Prayer is a relationship with God, and with a community of prayer,
which sustains us through the dark times of justice not being granted.”
Prayer regenerates, it makes more of itself
by holding our lives in the movement of God,
a movement that beckons us to meet God in prayer.
• And secondly he says, “Prayer is a relationship with God, and with a community of prayer,
which guides and corrects the content of our prayers to closer alignment with God's desire for justice, with love for our neighbours, and with love for our enemies”
Prayer differentiates, it becomes many different things
by weaving us into the tapestry of this world.
*In this way prayer doesn’t deny the desires of our hearts
but rather opens us up to the larger sweep of God’s justice.
Urging us to keep praying, allowing it to change us,
And our relationship to the injustice and pain of the world.
*But I have to say, what clenched this seemingly bizarre connection with prayer and stem cells
was when I walked through this week of mine,
witnessing death, illness, buckwheat batter, meals for the homeless…
and then I heard an interview with Dr. Doris Taylor, a pioneer in the study of stem cells and regeneration
who also works with the connection of spirituality and the healing of the body.
And as I listened, I had to wonder,
“am I hearing her talk about her work with stem cells,
or am I hearing her whisper to me something about prayer?”
Here are her words,
“… the most profound moment for me was…the first time I saw heart cells beating in a dish, just in a dish. [And I realized] we're able to put together these tools that nature's created
and they [know], in ways we'll never understand… how to become greater than the sum of the parts.
“We still haven't created a cell.” Taylor confesses.
“ I've said for 20 years that if we really wanted to understand a cell, we should just take a big white wall, draw a circle on it, and everyone who walks by should write down what they know.
And at some point maybe we'd get to the point that we understand even what a cell is.
We don't really know how it works.
“And the beautiful, beautiful, beautiful part is we don't have to.
*“We could spend the next 20, 30, 40 years trying to understand how this works,
or we can watch it work and understand it well enough…[and] maybe actually change somebody's life.
And that's what we really want to do.”
*Here is where Dr. Taylor laughs: “…[t]here's actually this great road sign from New Zealand, I believe, that somebody sent me from the Internet.
And it's a road sign, and you're coming into a town and it says: "Drive carefully.
We have two cemeteries and no hospital."
"And that's really how we have to approach this field. Drive carefully..
And yet we've got to keep driving because it matters. It matters.” (www.onbeing.org)
Keep driving…keep praying…never lose heart. Because it matters. It matters.
Luke 18:1-8
October 17, 2010
I don’t know much about stem cells.
There are probably a good number of you in here that know more than I do about stem cells.
After all, I am a practical theologian, not a scientist.
So when the flyers came in the mail when I was pregnant with Sebastian saying that once he was born, we could preserve the blood from his umbilical cord
--preserve the stem cells--I knew there had to be some catch.
Another way for us to drop thousands of dollars on the baby industry.
“Fearing” us into buying something that may, someday, be needed.
They said it could help him in the future if he developed a condition that stem cells could somehow treat.
*Really, I don’t know how it works. They just said it.
Torin and I thought, we’d take our chances and pray our child would forgive us if that unfortunate event ever did occur, and we had not stored his umbilical cord blood for a mere $100 a month fee.
And when the company providing this service followed up the flyers with a phone call, I was ready to give them a polite no thank you please don’t call again.
But I got more information from them as they talked.
They told me that if the child had an immediate relative with a disease that stem cells could possibly be used in treating,
that there was a charitable arm of the company that would store the cells at no cost for that relative.
No $100 a month handling fee. No charges. They would just do it.
*My mom had been recently diagnosed with leukemia.
Stem cells have been known to be effective in treating leukemia.
If things got really bad with her disease, Sebastian’s umbilical cord stem cells could be a potential option in his grandmother’s treatment.
So somewhere, in some freezer, there is a vile of blood that may, be used to help treat her disease.
Like a gift from grandson to grandmother.
Like a vile of prayers. Frozen. Ready to be thawed if… need be.
Hoping it will never need to be.
*Unlike most salespeople, I’m glad they kept knocking.
This is another thing I know about stem cells.
We all have them all over our body.
Most of us hear the loaded term “embryonic stem cells” when
the politicians start debating over the use of these cells in research, but really they’re everywhere in our body. And stem cells do two things: the regenerate and they differentiate,
meaning, they make more of themselves, and they become lots of different things.
*And these stem cells do amazing things.
Scientists have even taken a heart from the cadaver of a rat, wash out the dead cells, inject it with stem cells, and after great lengths, it started beating.
They brought a heart back to life.
*I know it can sound a bit like Frankenstein, just in time for the Halloween season, right?
But when Jesus talks about this widow as an example of always praying and never losing heart,
I know he is not talking about a real one, a real heart.
I know another translation for “never lose heart” is also “never give up” “keep being persistent.”
Pray always. Don’t lose heart.
*I don’t know why I can’t get stem cells out of my mind as I think about this scripture.
I even asked Torin, “Do you see any relationship between the widow and the judge and heart stem cells?”
*You can image the look he gave me.
*Because really, what we’re talking about here is prayer.
About constantly going to God in prayer,
banging on the door, demanding justice,
coming with viles of prayer ready to thaw and lay them on the door step.
Willing them to live. To beat. To cure and heal.
It’s no surprise that how we understand prayer reflects a lot about how we understand God.
Theologian Marjorie Suchocki reflects on some major ways we think of God by how we think of prayer.
I wonder if any of these sound familiar to you?
Sometimes we imagine God as the great genie in Aladdin’s bottle,
with prayer being the magic rubbing that draws the genie forth to do our bidding.
Or at times we approach God as our divine secretary,
ready to give God our memo for the day, which are our requests and prayers.
In seeing God as genie and God as secretary, we believe that God has the power to do the requests,
but the control rests in the one doing the asking.
We have the control.
Then there is God as the divine egoist.
This is when we think about prayer in terms of “God likes to be asked”
God could do all we want, if we stroke God’s ego enough.
Or similarly, we treat God like a king holding audience, who might grant a petitioner a boon.
This king knows what the petitioner wants, but is just waiting to act until properly asked.
Of course, these are extremes—caricatures.
But who among us has not wondered how prayer works? If it works? How God works with prayers? We often see ourselves in the scripture as the widow banging on God’s door demanding justice,
or healing, or fortunate blessings.
But God is not being likened to this judge in the scripture
but rather reflected on as the opposite of the judge.
If this man who neglects his duty as judge,
to care for widows and orphans, to listen and deal wisely…
if even this man answers, even after a long while, then don’t you think God will answer your prayers, and more quickly?
Well, don’t you?
I think we want to say “yes.”
I think we might move a notch up the honesty scale if we sigh “I hope so.”
And we will join the majority of the faithful if we collapse in the doorway
with our knuckles bruised from knocking so much, crying out “I just don’t know.”
*I like what George Hermanson shares about this scripture in a sermon of his:
He says “I can't answer for Jesus, but it has been true in my own limited experience of prayer that justice does not come quickly.
It has also been true that I am not very good at always praying and never giving up.
And it is also true that occasionally the process of praying has changed me,
changed what I have been praying for as I have seen how my prayers
were as self-centred as the unjust judge…”
He says, “The moral of the story is NOT about the judge finally responding.
The moral is about the widow's persistence for justice during the long period of the judge not responding and giving no indication that he ever would.”
(http://www.holytextures.com/2010/10/luke-18-1-8-year-c-pentecost-october-16-october-22-proper-24-ordinary-time-29-sermon.html)
*I started this week off by witnessing the death of our brother, Doug Porter.
Doug had a heart attack, and after his family had all arrived, they took him off the ventilator sustaining his life.
He went quickly, surrounded by love.
His heart was tired. It needed to rest.
His wife Lou and his family prayed that Doug would gain strength and remain with them.
It sounds like something we would all pray, doesn’t it?
But the prayer didn’t stop there.
They also prayed that if it Doug couldn’t stay in this life,
they asked God to strengthen them and their hearts to continue on without him.
*And I guess here is that strange connection for me, how prayers like this, hearken me back to stem cells.
Prayers regenerate and differentiate,
they make more of themselves
and they become many different things.
Similarly, Hermanson reflects on two aspects of prayer
• First, “Prayer is a relationship with God, and with a community of prayer,
which sustains us through the dark times of justice not being granted.”
Prayer regenerates, it makes more of itself
by holding our lives in the movement of God,
a movement that beckons us to meet God in prayer.
• And secondly he says, “Prayer is a relationship with God, and with a community of prayer,
which guides and corrects the content of our prayers to closer alignment with God's desire for justice, with love for our neighbours, and with love for our enemies”
Prayer differentiates, it becomes many different things
by weaving us into the tapestry of this world.
*In this way prayer doesn’t deny the desires of our hearts
but rather opens us up to the larger sweep of God’s justice.
Urging us to keep praying, allowing it to change us,
And our relationship to the injustice and pain of the world.
*But I have to say, what clenched this seemingly bizarre connection with prayer and stem cells
was when I walked through this week of mine,
witnessing death, illness, buckwheat batter, meals for the homeless…
and then I heard an interview with Dr. Doris Taylor, a pioneer in the study of stem cells and regeneration
who also works with the connection of spirituality and the healing of the body.
And as I listened, I had to wonder,
“am I hearing her talk about her work with stem cells,
or am I hearing her whisper to me something about prayer?”
Here are her words,
“… the most profound moment for me was…the first time I saw heart cells beating in a dish, just in a dish. [And I realized] we're able to put together these tools that nature's created
and they [know], in ways we'll never understand… how to become greater than the sum of the parts.
“We still haven't created a cell.” Taylor confesses.
“ I've said for 20 years that if we really wanted to understand a cell, we should just take a big white wall, draw a circle on it, and everyone who walks by should write down what they know.
And at some point maybe we'd get to the point that we understand even what a cell is.
We don't really know how it works.
“And the beautiful, beautiful, beautiful part is we don't have to.
*“We could spend the next 20, 30, 40 years trying to understand how this works,
or we can watch it work and understand it well enough…[and] maybe actually change somebody's life.
And that's what we really want to do.”
*Here is where Dr. Taylor laughs: “…[t]here's actually this great road sign from New Zealand, I believe, that somebody sent me from the Internet.
And it's a road sign, and you're coming into a town and it says: "Drive carefully.
We have two cemeteries and no hospital."
"And that's really how we have to approach this field. Drive carefully..
And yet we've got to keep driving because it matters. It matters.” (www.onbeing.org)
Keep driving…keep praying…never lose heart. Because it matters. It matters.
Monday, October 11, 2010
What do you Believe?
sermon by Torin Eikler
2 Timothy 2:8-15 Luke 17:11-19
For five years in the early 1950s the CBS Radio Network broadcast a regular show called “This I Believe?” on which women and men wrote short essays about their own personal motivation in life and then read them on the air. Some of you might even remember the voice of Edward R Murrow coming over the airwaves to introduce the program which, in his words, sought to “present the personal philosophies of thoughtful men and women in all walks of life.” It was his hope to counteract, in some small way, the growing sense of panic and paranoia that characterized the McCarthy Era by “[pointing] to the common meeting grounds of beliefs, which is the essence of brotherhood and the floor of our civilization.”
In 2005, Jay Allison and Dan Gediman revived the program which is broadcast periodically by National Public Radio. “As in the 1950s,” says Allison, “this is a time when belief is dividing the nation and the world. We are not listening well, not understanding each other -- we are simply disagreeing, or … worse.”
Since I first heard the show five years ago, I have listened to this new version of “This I Believe” somewhat less than religiously. I have been impressed by the way in which the show seeks to encourage people to develop understanding and respect for beliefs different from their own rather than simply to persuade them to agree on the same beliefs. It has been a refreshing voice as our society has become more and more caught up in a hardening of viewpoints that pushes us to take up residence in one camp or another, hurling epithets at all the others even as we are still setting up our tent.
But even more than that, what I have found absolutely fascinating is how many different things people identify among the core values that guide their lives. I may be somewhat influenced by my chosen profession, but when I hear the question, “what do you believe,” my thoughts always go straight to religion. Apparently, that is not the case for other people, though, because I have heard essays on topics ranging from playing baseball to finding God in the space between religions to living with autism to the Beatles. Each time I listen to a new one, I find myself amazed by the endless variety as well as moved by the passion and conviction in the voices of the readers as they lay out their own personal credos for all to see … in 500 words or less.
I don’t if I could do that. It’s hard to boil it all down, and I have a natural reluctance to do so since I have been taught since I was young that summaries like that always leave out important pieces. But I have been wondering lately if it might actually be a good idea.
As I was preparing to present on human sexuality at the district Bible study, I started thinking about how our opinions in so many areas of theology and the way that it should guide our lives seem to pull us apart. We find ourselves encamped and building up defenses almost before we realize it. Do we support or oppose same sex relationships? Do we support or oppose the leadership of women in the denomination? Do we support or oppose infant baptism or the military or … fill in the blank?
As Christians we have been struggling with questions like this for centuries, and it has led to division and the creation of hundreds of new denominations that often have quite a bit of animosity for one another. That seems to be somewhat at odds with the scriptures injunction to live together in unity. So it might be good for us to figure out exactly what is at the core of our faith. Perhaps we would find that all of us can come together around a few central beliefs. I don’t really think that would do away with denominations, but it could help us let go of the hostility and distrust that keep us at each other’s spiritual throats.
But where to begin…. What do we believe? What do you believe? Would it sound something like this?
I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.
Who, for us men and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary, and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate; He suffered and was buried; and the third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures; and ascended into heaven, and sits on the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again, with glory, to judge the quick and the dead; whose kingdom shall have no end.
And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of Life; who proceeds from the Father and the Son; who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets.
And I believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; and I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.
I have to admit that I didn’t write that. It’s the Nicene Creed as amended by the Third Council of Toledo in 589 (and by the way, the word catholic there at the end refers to the universal church not the one led by the Pope), and it was the official statement of faith for the church for centuries. Yet, even that wasn’t something that everyone could agree on. Even in the 6th century, people were wrangling over words to the point that the phrase, “who proceeds from the Father and the Son,” – just one word in Latin – lead to the separation of the Western church (eventually the big C Catholics) from the Eastern Orthodox Church.
Of course there were other factors at play as well, but there always are. And I have to wonder if including filioque – “and the Son” – instead of leaving it in the original form of “who proceeds from the Father” was all that important. It has significant repercussions for the theology of the Trinity, but does it really make a difference to your faith?
So what is? What do you believe?
The other day, I had a conversation with another pastor about what makes a Christian a Christian. We went back and forth a bit, but it came down to the question of whether Christians need to believe something in particular, if they need to live a certain way, or if they only need to claim Christ as Lord and Savior. Both of us, being of Anabaptist stock, felt that simply claiming Christ was not enough. “Christian,” at its simplest, means “follower of Christ,” and although scripture tells us that we are saved by faith alone, it also tells us that faith without works is dead.
The question of a “litmus test” belief, though, was never quite settled. Is it crucial to believe that Jesus Christ was God incarnate? I don’t really know. That’s a statement that was certainly under discussion among early believers, and there are still Christians today who struggle to accept such a claim.
At one point, my colleague pointed out that Jesus never claims to be God – that he simply says that he came from the Father and is going back to the Father. And that’s true. There is no direct indication that Jesus was divine though Christians have taken the beginning of John and its discussion of the Word made flesh to mean that. John was written a century after the death of Christ, and some scholars propose that the opening was included to make a point in the midst of an ongoing disagreement about the divinity of Christ among believers. It seems that the wrangling started a good deal earlier even than the Council of Toledo.
So, what did the earliest believers – the followers of way – agree on? I don’t think we’ll ever really be sure about that. The words that Paul wrote to Timothy should be a clue….
If we have died with him, we will also live with him;
If we endure, we will also reign with him;
If we deny him, he will also deny us;
If we are faithless, he remains faithful – for he cannot deny himself.
Like I said, those words should be a clue. But this is Paul we’re talking about, and his writing is … shall we say … difficult to understand at best.
It helps if we remember that Paul was writing to people that he had already taught. So, phrases like “If we have died with him, we will also live with him” were probably catch phrases that evoked a whole set of teachings with just a few words. Paul was also elaborating on what early Christian leaders had said to the Jews. So, we need to keep in mind what people like Peter had been preaching.
The first sermon given by Peter seems to stress just three things:
Jesus of Nazareth was sent by God,
he died and was raised from the dead,
and he was the promise Messiah spoken of in prophecy.
A bit later in Acts, Peter goes on to say that there is salvation in no one else.
Paul took pains to stay close to those words by Peter, even as he explained the promise of new life through Christ as reconciliation with God. Within that context – and with a little extra information from Paul’s other writings – we could, perhaps, interpret these words as an explanation of the nature of salvation and how it works. A quick (and therefore incomplete) summary might sound like this:
once we have given up the sinful way we used to live and committed ourselves to following Christ’s teachings no matter what may come our way, then even if we fall short in our efforts, Christ will welcome us into everlasting life with honor when this life comes to an end.
If we put all of that together, the earliest Christians believed that Jesus was the Messiah – the Christ – who had died and been raised from the dead and who came to bring salvation to the people, and that everyone who made the commitment to follow his teachings would receive the promise of eternal life. That seems to have been the core of the good news early on, and it seems pretty good to me, though I would have trouble stopping there (I did say earlier that I have trouble leaving things out if I think they are important).
I can say that I believe that … and I believe that Jesus was God … and I believe that all of creation will be reconciled to God according to God’s deepest desire … and … and …
and I believe that it may be time for us to stop wrangling so much about what we all believe, run back, and thank God for the wholeness and healing we have already received….
What do you believe?
2 Timothy 2:8-15 Luke 17:11-19
For five years in the early 1950s the CBS Radio Network broadcast a regular show called “This I Believe?” on which women and men wrote short essays about their own personal motivation in life and then read them on the air. Some of you might even remember the voice of Edward R Murrow coming over the airwaves to introduce the program which, in his words, sought to “present the personal philosophies of thoughtful men and women in all walks of life.” It was his hope to counteract, in some small way, the growing sense of panic and paranoia that characterized the McCarthy Era by “[pointing] to the common meeting grounds of beliefs, which is the essence of brotherhood and the floor of our civilization.”
In 2005, Jay Allison and Dan Gediman revived the program which is broadcast periodically by National Public Radio. “As in the 1950s,” says Allison, “this is a time when belief is dividing the nation and the world. We are not listening well, not understanding each other -- we are simply disagreeing, or … worse.”
Since I first heard the show five years ago, I have listened to this new version of “This I Believe” somewhat less than religiously. I have been impressed by the way in which the show seeks to encourage people to develop understanding and respect for beliefs different from their own rather than simply to persuade them to agree on the same beliefs. It has been a refreshing voice as our society has become more and more caught up in a hardening of viewpoints that pushes us to take up residence in one camp or another, hurling epithets at all the others even as we are still setting up our tent.
But even more than that, what I have found absolutely fascinating is how many different things people identify among the core values that guide their lives. I may be somewhat influenced by my chosen profession, but when I hear the question, “what do you believe,” my thoughts always go straight to religion. Apparently, that is not the case for other people, though, because I have heard essays on topics ranging from playing baseball to finding God in the space between religions to living with autism to the Beatles. Each time I listen to a new one, I find myself amazed by the endless variety as well as moved by the passion and conviction in the voices of the readers as they lay out their own personal credos for all to see … in 500 words or less.
I don’t if I could do that. It’s hard to boil it all down, and I have a natural reluctance to do so since I have been taught since I was young that summaries like that always leave out important pieces. But I have been wondering lately if it might actually be a good idea.
As I was preparing to present on human sexuality at the district Bible study, I started thinking about how our opinions in so many areas of theology and the way that it should guide our lives seem to pull us apart. We find ourselves encamped and building up defenses almost before we realize it. Do we support or oppose same sex relationships? Do we support or oppose the leadership of women in the denomination? Do we support or oppose infant baptism or the military or … fill in the blank?
As Christians we have been struggling with questions like this for centuries, and it has led to division and the creation of hundreds of new denominations that often have quite a bit of animosity for one another. That seems to be somewhat at odds with the scriptures injunction to live together in unity. So it might be good for us to figure out exactly what is at the core of our faith. Perhaps we would find that all of us can come together around a few central beliefs. I don’t really think that would do away with denominations, but it could help us let go of the hostility and distrust that keep us at each other’s spiritual throats.
But where to begin…. What do we believe? What do you believe? Would it sound something like this?
I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.
Who, for us men and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary, and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate; He suffered and was buried; and the third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures; and ascended into heaven, and sits on the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again, with glory, to judge the quick and the dead; whose kingdom shall have no end.
And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of Life; who proceeds from the Father and the Son; who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets.
And I believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; and I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.
I have to admit that I didn’t write that. It’s the Nicene Creed as amended by the Third Council of Toledo in 589 (and by the way, the word catholic there at the end refers to the universal church not the one led by the Pope), and it was the official statement of faith for the church for centuries. Yet, even that wasn’t something that everyone could agree on. Even in the 6th century, people were wrangling over words to the point that the phrase, “who proceeds from the Father and the Son,” – just one word in Latin – lead to the separation of the Western church (eventually the big C Catholics) from the Eastern Orthodox Church.
Of course there were other factors at play as well, but there always are. And I have to wonder if including filioque – “and the Son” – instead of leaving it in the original form of “who proceeds from the Father” was all that important. It has significant repercussions for the theology of the Trinity, but does it really make a difference to your faith?
So what is? What do you believe?
The other day, I had a conversation with another pastor about what makes a Christian a Christian. We went back and forth a bit, but it came down to the question of whether Christians need to believe something in particular, if they need to live a certain way, or if they only need to claim Christ as Lord and Savior. Both of us, being of Anabaptist stock, felt that simply claiming Christ was not enough. “Christian,” at its simplest, means “follower of Christ,” and although scripture tells us that we are saved by faith alone, it also tells us that faith without works is dead.
The question of a “litmus test” belief, though, was never quite settled. Is it crucial to believe that Jesus Christ was God incarnate? I don’t really know. That’s a statement that was certainly under discussion among early believers, and there are still Christians today who struggle to accept such a claim.
At one point, my colleague pointed out that Jesus never claims to be God – that he simply says that he came from the Father and is going back to the Father. And that’s true. There is no direct indication that Jesus was divine though Christians have taken the beginning of John and its discussion of the Word made flesh to mean that. John was written a century after the death of Christ, and some scholars propose that the opening was included to make a point in the midst of an ongoing disagreement about the divinity of Christ among believers. It seems that the wrangling started a good deal earlier even than the Council of Toledo.
So, what did the earliest believers – the followers of way – agree on? I don’t think we’ll ever really be sure about that. The words that Paul wrote to Timothy should be a clue….
If we have died with him, we will also live with him;
If we endure, we will also reign with him;
If we deny him, he will also deny us;
If we are faithless, he remains faithful – for he cannot deny himself.
Like I said, those words should be a clue. But this is Paul we’re talking about, and his writing is … shall we say … difficult to understand at best.
It helps if we remember that Paul was writing to people that he had already taught. So, phrases like “If we have died with him, we will also live with him” were probably catch phrases that evoked a whole set of teachings with just a few words. Paul was also elaborating on what early Christian leaders had said to the Jews. So, we need to keep in mind what people like Peter had been preaching.
The first sermon given by Peter seems to stress just three things:
Jesus of Nazareth was sent by God,
he died and was raised from the dead,
and he was the promise Messiah spoken of in prophecy.
A bit later in Acts, Peter goes on to say that there is salvation in no one else.
Paul took pains to stay close to those words by Peter, even as he explained the promise of new life through Christ as reconciliation with God. Within that context – and with a little extra information from Paul’s other writings – we could, perhaps, interpret these words as an explanation of the nature of salvation and how it works. A quick (and therefore incomplete) summary might sound like this:
once we have given up the sinful way we used to live and committed ourselves to following Christ’s teachings no matter what may come our way, then even if we fall short in our efforts, Christ will welcome us into everlasting life with honor when this life comes to an end.
If we put all of that together, the earliest Christians believed that Jesus was the Messiah – the Christ – who had died and been raised from the dead and who came to bring salvation to the people, and that everyone who made the commitment to follow his teachings would receive the promise of eternal life. That seems to have been the core of the good news early on, and it seems pretty good to me, though I would have trouble stopping there (I did say earlier that I have trouble leaving things out if I think they are important).
I can say that I believe that … and I believe that Jesus was God … and I believe that all of creation will be reconciled to God according to God’s deepest desire … and … and …
and I believe that it may be time for us to stop wrangling so much about what we all believe, run back, and thank God for the wholeness and healing we have already received….
What do you believe?
Sunday, October 3, 2010
“Rekindle the Gift of God”
sermon by Carrie Eikler
2 Timothy 1:1-14
October 3, 2010
World Communion Sunday
Sunday nights in the Eikler household is movie night. We use it as a chance to unwind. Strange, I know, that one would need to “unwind” from a day of Sabbath, but Sundays take on a whole different meaning when you’re a pastor. Weekends are never the same. So to “unwind” we often lay a quilt on the floor, pop popcorn, slice apples and cheese, and watch a movie with the kids. Then after putting them to bed, Torin and I watch another movie…more geared towards our interests.
I mean, there are only so many times you can watch the kids show “Cars” before you go absolutely mad.
On movie night a couple of weeks ago, Torin and I curled up to watch “Date Night” with Steve Carell and Tina Fey. The plot starts out pretty standard for Claire and Phil Foster: married couple, two kids, middle class jobs, middle class house, middle class lives. Lots of love. Lots of laughter. Lots of activities…lots of boredom. Phil and Claire begin to wonder if they are simply more than just really good roommates to each other.
But even in spite of exhaustion, they kept their regular date nights together, as unglamorous as a suburban New Jersey steakhouse might be. It sort of resembled there lives together really: Solid. Predictable. Comfortable. But one night they throw all caution to the wind and go into the city for Date Night and what results is a comedic romp of mistaken identity, political scandal, car chases, and of course since this is a Hollywood film, a happy and tidy ending.
It makes many of us married folks a bit anxious to watch movies like this. Is this what we need to spice up our relationship? To rekindle that flame? I think I’d prefer the boring, but stable suburban steakhouse. Wouldn’t I?
But to be honest, you don’t have to be married to know what it is like for things to feel dull. Most of us have had friendships go stale, or jobs that become just boring, or houses that feel more like huge dustbins than homes. I even found a certain type of movie I used to love start to lose my attention.
And lest we forget that we are more than flesh and bone, and workers, and partners, and parents, and friends…we are reminded in this strangely pertinent letter that we heard today that yes, our spirits, can (and often) lack a bit of luster. Spiritual boredom.
I spent far too much time this week trying to think about how to explain what spiritual boredom feels like, but after a while I realized: I doubt I need to tell you what it feels like is. (////) I think we have all experienced it
Don’t you get a feeling in this letter that maybe Paul was sensing a bit of something like this in Timothy? And he’s likely not simply singling out Timothy. These pastoral letters weren’t meant to be personal correspondence: there was a broader audience. They were meant to be read and shared with the entire community. Paul is not Timothy’s personal leadership coach, Paul is talking to everyone here. “Rekindle the gift of God that is within you.” (//) We can only imagine, things had started to loose a bit of spark in these people’s lives.
Isn’t it nice when our private struggles, turn out to be more common than we think? That there are lots more-tons, millions!-of people who share in some part of that struggle. How many people, who have been married for more than a few years, cannot watch Date Night and find something in that dull marriage that makes them smile and say “Mmhmm, that’s right.”?
Can you not relate to what perhaps Paul is seeing? (///) And I don’t Paul chastising here. I hear him naming a reality for all who have chosen to walk the path of Christ…. because in walking we can get tired. Even the things we love so much--our spouses, children, friends, vocations--can get boring.
I love the part in this letter when Paul brings in Timothy’s grandmother and mother, Lois and Eunice. We don’t know these woman. They aren’t part of any story that we know of. But they stand at the front of Paul’s emphatic reminder of Timothy’s spiritual vibrancy.
It isn’t exactly like Paul to venerate woman, as you can see if we continue on reading in 2 Timothy. So whether this is a contrast Paul is setting up for a later comparison, or if it is some sort of motivational strategy, we’re not sure. But he recognizes the power of these women on this community.
If it is true that Timothy and those around him are feeling a little less than spiritually energized, then maybe recalling these women is meant to give them a bit of a jolt: Like Paul is saying, “It’s there! This faith, this sincere, powerful faith isn’t just in your head because of what you learned, not even in your soul because of what you experienced—it’s in your blood!” The potential for spiritual vibrancy is like the pilot light on the stove, reminding us that it just needs a little gas to turn on the flame.
:) “Just turn it on.” Isn’t that what we’re always told to do? If there is a problem, just try to fix it. Is your marriage a bit dull? Spice it up with an urban romp of death-defying car chases and gun fights…at least, go out to a nice restaurant. Don’t like your job? Quit, and get a new one…as least when the economy starts looking up again. Is your spiritual life a bit bland? Just rekindle it by purchasing this book, going on this retreat, finding another church…as least when it works for you and your schedule.
We all know that it takes more than flowers and chocolate to rekindle love in a marriage. More than a new office or job title to get a resurgence of purpose in the workplace. More than empty gestures prescribed in spirituality books and entertaining worships to help us rekindle the gift of God within us. Maybe this tendency is known too well to Paul, for he tells Timothy’s community that we are called by God’s grace, not solely by the things we do or the way we feel inside. A spiritual love affair is not patched up with spiritual chocolate, or a spiritual date.
But really, don’t we know those external things are important…at least appreciated? If married love is never expressed with a kiss or caress partners can feel isolated in the unspoken comfort of committed love. Don’t we show that we are people of God by the way we live our lives, those works that are called of us, the proclamation by James that faith without works is dead?
At times it seems like a chicken or the egg question: “To start the path to spiritual rekindling should I first focus on internal faith, or external works? Faith or works? Faith or works?”
Unfortunately, I don’t think there are any quick fixes to this. Lots of possibilities, but no definitive word that can work for everyone. But maybe searching for quick fix is more a problem than a solution. We do want a check list to proceed through, a systematic approach to this rekindling. And in the process of reconciling what seems to be two polar opposites, we get stymied in the either/or approach and we’re left more paralyzed than we are passionate.
But I am trying to see them not as polar opposites, pulling in two different directions, but as two tensions pushing against each other: engagement rather that resistance. Perhaps it is this bumping up against each other, rubbing together, challenging, and living, and working together that makes a spark. Maybe this is part of that rekindling—the creative friction when we engage our faith and our works, our inner and outer.
This creative friction, like flint against steel, strikes and rubs against each other. And if you’ve every tried to catch something on fire by striking flint against steel you know it often doesn’t happen on the first go. There’s a lot of striking, bumping up together. And in the process, before the spark is kindled—or rekindled—the two elements share a connection, maybe even share a bit of themselves.
Steel breaking off flint. Flint leaving a dusty smudge on steel.
Paul knows that Timothy’s faith is strong. It’s in his blood, it’s not something he can lose. Perhaps Paul knows it’s more than Timothy trying to get that spark going by returning to first passionate faith—more than just turning on what has been there before. Maybe it is for him, and maybe for all of us, about finding what we need to rub up against, to engage, to cause creative friction in our souls.
For me communion does this. Coming from a tradition that rarely viewed communion as transformative outside of Love Feast, I take issue with this perspective. Humanity, as the lover of God, needs that regular physical reminder. In communion, my life bumps up against God’s story. In communion I feel God in sometimes subtle, in sometimes powerful ways rubbing up against us in this most dramatic act of devotion and sacrifice for humankind.
And in this act, God is not only rekindled in us, but I believe we are rekindled in God. A breaking off of one another, a smudging of humanity and God. And in this moment of creative friction, we mingle. God and us. God and you.
(///)
And maybe there’s a spark. And maybe there’s not. But there is a rekindling gift in the moment of meeting and the crashing together of humanity and God. Persistently—over time-- engaging one another. Both are transformed. Neither is the same.
And in breaking, and in smudging, a spark will come. Amen.
Come, meet God in these moments of communion.
2 Timothy 1:1-14
October 3, 2010
World Communion Sunday
Sunday nights in the Eikler household is movie night. We use it as a chance to unwind. Strange, I know, that one would need to “unwind” from a day of Sabbath, but Sundays take on a whole different meaning when you’re a pastor. Weekends are never the same. So to “unwind” we often lay a quilt on the floor, pop popcorn, slice apples and cheese, and watch a movie with the kids. Then after putting them to bed, Torin and I watch another movie…more geared towards our interests.
I mean, there are only so many times you can watch the kids show “Cars” before you go absolutely mad.
On movie night a couple of weeks ago, Torin and I curled up to watch “Date Night” with Steve Carell and Tina Fey. The plot starts out pretty standard for Claire and Phil Foster: married couple, two kids, middle class jobs, middle class house, middle class lives. Lots of love. Lots of laughter. Lots of activities…lots of boredom. Phil and Claire begin to wonder if they are simply more than just really good roommates to each other.
But even in spite of exhaustion, they kept their regular date nights together, as unglamorous as a suburban New Jersey steakhouse might be. It sort of resembled there lives together really: Solid. Predictable. Comfortable. But one night they throw all caution to the wind and go into the city for Date Night and what results is a comedic romp of mistaken identity, political scandal, car chases, and of course since this is a Hollywood film, a happy and tidy ending.
It makes many of us married folks a bit anxious to watch movies like this. Is this what we need to spice up our relationship? To rekindle that flame? I think I’d prefer the boring, but stable suburban steakhouse. Wouldn’t I?
But to be honest, you don’t have to be married to know what it is like for things to feel dull. Most of us have had friendships go stale, or jobs that become just boring, or houses that feel more like huge dustbins than homes. I even found a certain type of movie I used to love start to lose my attention.
And lest we forget that we are more than flesh and bone, and workers, and partners, and parents, and friends…we are reminded in this strangely pertinent letter that we heard today that yes, our spirits, can (and often) lack a bit of luster. Spiritual boredom.
I spent far too much time this week trying to think about how to explain what spiritual boredom feels like, but after a while I realized: I doubt I need to tell you what it feels like is. (////) I think we have all experienced it
Don’t you get a feeling in this letter that maybe Paul was sensing a bit of something like this in Timothy? And he’s likely not simply singling out Timothy. These pastoral letters weren’t meant to be personal correspondence: there was a broader audience. They were meant to be read and shared with the entire community. Paul is not Timothy’s personal leadership coach, Paul is talking to everyone here. “Rekindle the gift of God that is within you.” (//) We can only imagine, things had started to loose a bit of spark in these people’s lives.
Isn’t it nice when our private struggles, turn out to be more common than we think? That there are lots more-tons, millions!-of people who share in some part of that struggle. How many people, who have been married for more than a few years, cannot watch Date Night and find something in that dull marriage that makes them smile and say “Mmhmm, that’s right.”?
Can you not relate to what perhaps Paul is seeing? (///) And I don’t Paul chastising here. I hear him naming a reality for all who have chosen to walk the path of Christ…. because in walking we can get tired. Even the things we love so much--our spouses, children, friends, vocations--can get boring.
I love the part in this letter when Paul brings in Timothy’s grandmother and mother, Lois and Eunice. We don’t know these woman. They aren’t part of any story that we know of. But they stand at the front of Paul’s emphatic reminder of Timothy’s spiritual vibrancy.
It isn’t exactly like Paul to venerate woman, as you can see if we continue on reading in 2 Timothy. So whether this is a contrast Paul is setting up for a later comparison, or if it is some sort of motivational strategy, we’re not sure. But he recognizes the power of these women on this community.
If it is true that Timothy and those around him are feeling a little less than spiritually energized, then maybe recalling these women is meant to give them a bit of a jolt: Like Paul is saying, “It’s there! This faith, this sincere, powerful faith isn’t just in your head because of what you learned, not even in your soul because of what you experienced—it’s in your blood!” The potential for spiritual vibrancy is like the pilot light on the stove, reminding us that it just needs a little gas to turn on the flame.
:) “Just turn it on.” Isn’t that what we’re always told to do? If there is a problem, just try to fix it. Is your marriage a bit dull? Spice it up with an urban romp of death-defying car chases and gun fights…at least, go out to a nice restaurant. Don’t like your job? Quit, and get a new one…as least when the economy starts looking up again. Is your spiritual life a bit bland? Just rekindle it by purchasing this book, going on this retreat, finding another church…as least when it works for you and your schedule.
We all know that it takes more than flowers and chocolate to rekindle love in a marriage. More than a new office or job title to get a resurgence of purpose in the workplace. More than empty gestures prescribed in spirituality books and entertaining worships to help us rekindle the gift of God within us. Maybe this tendency is known too well to Paul, for he tells Timothy’s community that we are called by God’s grace, not solely by the things we do or the way we feel inside. A spiritual love affair is not patched up with spiritual chocolate, or a spiritual date.
But really, don’t we know those external things are important…at least appreciated? If married love is never expressed with a kiss or caress partners can feel isolated in the unspoken comfort of committed love. Don’t we show that we are people of God by the way we live our lives, those works that are called of us, the proclamation by James that faith without works is dead?
At times it seems like a chicken or the egg question: “To start the path to spiritual rekindling should I first focus on internal faith, or external works? Faith or works? Faith or works?”
Unfortunately, I don’t think there are any quick fixes to this. Lots of possibilities, but no definitive word that can work for everyone. But maybe searching for quick fix is more a problem than a solution. We do want a check list to proceed through, a systematic approach to this rekindling. And in the process of reconciling what seems to be two polar opposites, we get stymied in the either/or approach and we’re left more paralyzed than we are passionate.
But I am trying to see them not as polar opposites, pulling in two different directions, but as two tensions pushing against each other: engagement rather that resistance. Perhaps it is this bumping up against each other, rubbing together, challenging, and living, and working together that makes a spark. Maybe this is part of that rekindling—the creative friction when we engage our faith and our works, our inner and outer.
This creative friction, like flint against steel, strikes and rubs against each other. And if you’ve every tried to catch something on fire by striking flint against steel you know it often doesn’t happen on the first go. There’s a lot of striking, bumping up together. And in the process, before the spark is kindled—or rekindled—the two elements share a connection, maybe even share a bit of themselves.
Steel breaking off flint. Flint leaving a dusty smudge on steel.
Paul knows that Timothy’s faith is strong. It’s in his blood, it’s not something he can lose. Perhaps Paul knows it’s more than Timothy trying to get that spark going by returning to first passionate faith—more than just turning on what has been there before. Maybe it is for him, and maybe for all of us, about finding what we need to rub up against, to engage, to cause creative friction in our souls.
For me communion does this. Coming from a tradition that rarely viewed communion as transformative outside of Love Feast, I take issue with this perspective. Humanity, as the lover of God, needs that regular physical reminder. In communion, my life bumps up against God’s story. In communion I feel God in sometimes subtle, in sometimes powerful ways rubbing up against us in this most dramatic act of devotion and sacrifice for humankind.
And in this act, God is not only rekindled in us, but I believe we are rekindled in God. A breaking off of one another, a smudging of humanity and God. And in this moment of creative friction, we mingle. God and us. God and you.
(///)
And maybe there’s a spark. And maybe there’s not. But there is a rekindling gift in the moment of meeting and the crashing together of humanity and God. Persistently—over time-- engaging one another. Both are transformed. Neither is the same.
And in breaking, and in smudging, a spark will come. Amen.
Come, meet God in these moments of communion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)