Sunday, March 3, 2013

Love and Justice

sermon by Torin Eikler
Luke 13:1-9     Isaiah 55:1-11


Two weeks ago, I watched the movie, “Arbitrage,” which is one of the first critically acclaimed post-financial meltdown films to explore the world of high finance.  As you might guess, the story has a lot to do with risky and questionable business practices by men who make million-dollar deals every day.  But it gets much of its power to captivate from a plot twist that comes when a detective shows up to investigate the accidental death of the main character’s mistress (he did do it, by the way).

In the course of the investigation, the detective has a bit of an argument with the District Attorney and a judge about how to proceed.  His two superiors recommend a cautious course, and the detective vents his frustration in response, saying something like, “So we just sit back and let him get away?  … Why?!  Why should these scum get away with things like this.  They bury it in money, and we just look the other way.  This is a chance to get one of them… to bring him to justice.  Just once I’d like to bring one of them to justice.”

I liked that line.  It appeals to the part of me that really likes balance.  A person collects immense wealth by preying on those lower on the economic ladder … they deserve to be preyed upon themselves.  A person does something wrong … they deserve punishment.  When there seems to be no sense of remorse … even when there is remorse, but especially when there’s not … I want justice to be served.  So, I completely understood that detective’s frustration and anger.

Then I remembered the words of Sister Helen PreJean in our Sunday School class a couple of months ago, sharing her distinctive perspective on the in-justice of the death penalty in particular and much of our punitive system of justice in general, and the voice of my younger self and my friends in heated conversation came back to me, and I began to wonder, again, about the balance between “good” and “evil” … between justice and mercy, and about the difficulty of understanding and accepting God’s justice while welcoming and trusting God’s compassion.


Recently, I read something interesting about justice and compassion in the Bible.  It seems that the concept of compassion was somewhat different in the culture of the time.  We understand it to mean “a feeling of deep sympathy and sorrow for another who is stricken by misfortune, accompanied by a strong desire to alleviate the suffering.”[1]  We act on our compassion by trying to help people directly.  We give them money or food or sit with them in their grief and despair hoping that our company will ease their suffering.

It was not that way in the past.  I don’t mean to say that people did not take care of one another in exactly the same ways.  I’m certain they did.  It’s in our nature as loving beings to reach out and offer support and comfort to one another, and there is ample Biblical evidence of people doing exactly that.  Yet, compassion in that time was not so personal or individual a thing.  While people undoubtedly felt “deep sympathy and sorrow” for each other, their compassionate response was directed toward achieving justice for victims, and that often meant seeing those who caused suffering punished or the unfair situation “fixed.”

That sounds like a good process.  I’d love it if our system worked that way, but there was a bit of a twist there as well.  If there was no obvious cause for suffering or if there was no justification or simply no way to “fix” things, then it was often assumed that Divine justice was a work in the situation.  The person or people who were suffering, were suffering because of something they had done in the past … some hidden and evil action that God was seeking to punish in order to bring about justice.  At least that was the general consensus, and it was that perspective on justice that Jesus was addressing with his parable.

 
Leading up to the passage that was just read for us -- just the chapter before -- Jesus was speaking to the crowds who were following him.  He warned them against greed and against taking advantage of others in order to gain added wealth or respect for themselves.  He called on them to embrace mercy and to be prepared at all times to welcome the Kingdom of God.  And he got a little apocalyptic on them, announcing that he “came to bring fire to the earth” – fire that would set father again son and mother against daughter.  Then, he finished off by telling them that they were good at interpreting the weather, and then asked them, “Why do you not know how to interpret the present time?”

Some in the crowd rose to the occasion, challenging Jesus himself to interpret the meaning of a case of unjust suffering.  The case was a recent headliner.  Some Galileans had been murdered by Pontius Pilate in a ghastly event.  There was no explicit question asked, but there was certainly one implied.  Did those Galileans deserve it?  Was Pilate the instrument of divine judgment against them and consequent punishment?  Was God’s justice served by their deaths?

According to the wisdom of the day, the answer would have been “yes” to all those questions.  As hard as it would have been to stomach, the only option people had to explain why such a horrible thing would happen to people would have been to assume that it was God’s will.  And since God would never do such a horrible thing to innocent people, they must have deserved it.

If that was their understanding, you can’t really blame them for posing this question … and, in fact, Jesus doesn’t chastise them.  He lets them know he understands their dilemma with the question he asks in return, “Do you think that … these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans?”  “No,” he says, but he doesn’t let them off the hook.  This may have been a case of incredible injustice on the part of the Roman Empire, but that doesn’t mean that God is happy about the greedy, unjust lives of the people.  They still need to repent or risk the hand of divine justice when it comes right down to it.

 
And yet, Jesus doesn’t leave them hanging there, dreading the hand of God.  Instead he tells them a parable – the story of a barren fig tree.  A landowner had planted the fig tree in his vineyard three years earlier, and he figured that it was about time to gather figs from it.  But when he went to take a look, he found that the tree had no fruit. As a good steward of his land and crops, the he concluded that there were two problems at hand: the tree is worthless, and it was taking up space that could otherwise have been productive in the vineyard. It was time to cut it down.

Enter the caretaker – the gardener who had been hired to care for the vineyard.  He pleads for patience.  “Give it another year,” he says.  In the meantime I will loosen the soil around it and add fertilizer.  It might still produce fruit in another year, and that would be good.  There would be no need to replace the tree with another.  Besides, if the tree were replaced by another, the new tree would need several years to produce fruit.  There is good reason to give this tree another chance.  On the other hand, if it does not produce fruit in another year, then it can and should be cut down.

 
It’s fairly common to assume that the landowner is God and the gardener Jesus.  But Luke doesn’t show us a picture of an angry God who needs to be placated or dissuaded anywhere else in his gospel.  So, why would he throw one in here?  Luke’s God is the father who scans the horizon day in and day out waiting for his wayward son to come home.  She is the woman who spends all night sweeping her house in search of a lost coin and, then, throws a party costing more than its value to celebrate its recovery.  He is the shepherd who leaves behind the entire flock to go and save the one lost sheep.  Given this picture of God’s reaction to sin, I wonder if it would be better to imagine that this peculiar gardener is God – a God who is curiously partial to unyielding fig trees.

That’s a new way of thinking about it for me, I’ll admit.  I have more often named God judge rather than advocate, and I like having a divine Arbiter of Justice to go along with the equally divine Bringer of Mercy.  Yet, Isaiah reminds us that God’s thoughts are not like our thoughts and God’s ways are not like our ways.  And I think that might just mean that God isn’t beneath loosening the soil around us and even spreading manure in the hope that we may bear fruit. … Why? … Because God loves us and wants the best for us.[2]

 
That’s what this parable is about.  It takes us out of ourselves in order to give a more complete perspective on the balance between judgment and grace.  And it says in no uncertain terms that scales tip in favor of grace every time.  How could it be otherwise when we follow a God who has come to us again and again – even sent his son – to try and help us understand the truth of God’s love? [3]  

God’s love is beyond our understanding.  So excessive that it embraces all of this world – the good and the bad alike.  So complete that it cares about even the smallest child.  So abundant that it never ceases to gush forth in an endless spray that caresses every moment of our lives.

That doesn’t mean that we get to just sit back and let the good times roll.  God’s grace … God’s love is not casual or indifferent.  It begs for action, and as God’s children, we are called to respond.  We are called to bear the fruit of the Kingdom, and to do that we need to change.


Are we, ourselves, not still guilty of a thousand sins little and big.  Don’t we still choose to act on the impulses of greed and pride?  How often do we put aside mercy and compassion when they are inconvenient or deprive us of the satisfaction of seeing a neighbor get his or her comeuppance?  Are we any better – any less sinful – any less in need of repentance than the Galileans in the crowd?

We need to turn off of the paths of barrenness and return to God’s way of abundance.  AND the good news is that God is waiting for us … and not just waiting.  God is digging the compost of our lives in around our roots, encouraging us to change … to bear fruit. 

 
God’s love and mercy … God’s compassion and grace are working to give us a second chance at life – real, true life.  In God’s infinite and incomprehensible wisdom and love, we have a second chance … or a third … or a forty-third.  Grab hold of it, turn onto the paths of abundant life so that you, too, can bear fruit worthy of the Gardener who cares for you.


[1] definition taken from dictionary.com
[2] draws on material posted by David Lose at http://www.workingpreacher.org/dear_wp.aspx?article_id=671on February 27, 2013.
[3] draws on material posted by Arland J. Holtgren at http://www.workingpreacher.org/preaching.aspx?tab=4&alt=1 as commentary for March 3, 2013.

No comments: